Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with heart failure with supra-normal ejection fraction: data from LECRA-HF registry

Abstract Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains insufficiently characterized subgroup of HF with increasing prevalence and limited treatment options. Relationship between clinically assessed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and survival showed that LVEF ≥65% is associated with higher mortality. Therefore, a novel category of heart failure with supra-normal left ventricular ejection fraction (HFsnEF) was introduced in 2019. However, clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of HFsnEF patients remain insufficiently elucidated. Purpose We sought to characterize Polish HFsnEF patients and to provide their long-term mortality in comparison to HFpEF. Methods Of 1186 patients enrolled in the single-center Lesser Poland Cracovian Heart Failure (LECRA-HF) Registry between 2009 and 2019 and hospitalized due to HF decompensation 261 (22%) of them were those with LVEF ≥50%. 40 (15.3%) of them were classified as HFsnEF (LVEF ≥65%) and the remaining 221 (84.7%) as HFpEF. The data including patients’ demography, anthropometric measurements, cardiovascular risk factors, prior cardiological treatment and other comorbidities were collected. The long-term follow-up of all-cause mortality was obtained from the Polish National Death Registry. Results HFsnEF patients were less frequently hypertensive (75 vs 88.2%, P=0.026) and had higher baseline LVEF (65 [65-70] vs 55 [50-60] %, P<0.001) than HFpEF subjects. Furthermore, HFsnEF patients presented lower INR (1.1 [1-1.6] vs 1.3 [1.1-1.9], P=0.027) and total protein level (57 [25-63] vs (65.2 [60.2-69.9] g/L, P=0.008) on admission. HFsnEF patients were less frequently treated on discharge with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (25 vs 46.2%, P=0.013) as well as loop diuretics (60 vs 76%, P=0.017). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that all-cause mortality is higher in HFsnEF than in HFpEF (65.0 vs 55.2%, P=0.044, Figure 1). The independent predictors of long-term mortality were age and diagnosis of HFsnEF (HR 1.037, 95% CI 1.018-1.056 and HR 1.665, 95% CI 1.063-2.608, respectively). Conclusions Our findings indicate that every seventh Polish patient admitted with HFpEF could be classified as HFsnEF. Baseline characteristics of HFsnEF patients are different than HFpEF. Simultaneously, the HFsnEF diagnosis is associated with lower long-term survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1185
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with heart failure with supra-normal ejection fraction: data from LECRA-HF registry

Jadwiga Nessler, Jakub Furczyński, Michael Platschek, Anna Matrejek et al.
1 citations
European Heart Journal
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
0.40
article

Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with heart failure with supra-normal ejection fraction: data from LECRA-HF registry

Jadwiga Nessler, Jakub Furczyński, Michael Platschek, Anna Matrejek, J Zalewski, Klaudia Nowak, N Kachnic, Konrad Stępień, Aleksandra Karcińska, Alicia Del Carmen Yika, Kinga L. Eliasz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains insufficiently characterized subgroup of HF with increasing prevalence and limited treatment options. Relationship between clinically assessed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and survival showed that LVEF ≥65% is associated with higher mortality. Therefore, a novel category of heart failure with supra-normal left ventricular ejection fraction (HFsnEF) was introduced in 2019. However, clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of HFsnEF patients remain insufficiently elucidated. Purpose We sought to characterize Polish HFsnEF patients and to provide their long-term mortality in comparison to HFpEF. Methods Of 1186 patients enrolled in the single-center Lesser Poland Cracovian Heart Failure (LECRA-HF) Registry between 2009 and 2019 and hospitalized due to HF decompensation 261 (22%) of them were those with LVEF ≥50%. 40 (15.3%) of them were classified as HFsnEF (LVEF ≥65%) and the remaining 221 (84.7%) as HFpEF. The data including patients’ demography, anthropometric measurements, cardiovascular risk factors, prior cardiological treatment and other comorbidities were collected. The long-term follow-up of all-cause mortality was obtained from the Polish National Death Registry. Results HFsnEF patients were less frequently hypertensive (75 vs 88.2%, P=0.026) and had higher baseline LVEF (65 [65-70] vs 55 [50-60] %, P<0.001) than HFpEF subjects. Furthermore, HFsnEF patients presented lower INR (1.1 [1-1.6] vs 1.3 [1.1-1.9], P=0.027) and total protein level (57 [25-63] vs (65.2 [60.2-69.9] g/L, P=0.008) on admission. HFsnEF patients were less frequently treated on discharge with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (25 vs 46.2%, P=0.013) as well as loop diuretics (60 vs 76%, P=0.017). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that all-cause mortality is higher in HFsnEF than in HFpEF (65.0 vs 55.2%, P=0.044, Figure 1). The independent predictors of long-term mortality were age and diagnosis of HFsnEF (HR 1.037, 95% CI 1.018-1.056 and HR 1.665, 95% CI 1.063-2.608, respectively). Conclusions Our findings indicate that every seventh Polish patient admitted with HFpEF could be classified as HFsnEF. Baseline characteristics of HFsnEF patients are different than HFpEF. Simultaneously, the HFsnEF diagnosis is associated with lower long-term survival.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Jagiellonian University (PL), John Paul II Hospital (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.