Comparing the utility of 3D vs 2D left atrial volumes by echocardiography to predict stroke in the general population

Abstract Background Left atrial (LA) volume dilatation is associated with stroke in the general population. Two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is commonly used to measure LA size but is known to underestimate LA volumes compared to three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE). It is unknown whether this difference has clinical significance. Purpose We hypothesized that LA volumes by 3DE are more closely associated with stroke risk than 2DE in the general population. Methods We included 2,085 participants from a longitudinal cohort study from the general population who underwent 3DE and 2DE assessment of maximal and minimal LA volume index (LAVimax and LAVimin, respectively). After excluding participants with poor image quality, low volume rate, atrial fibrillation at baseline and non-sinus-rhythm during examination, a total of 1,956 participants were included for this analysis. The endpoint was stroke. Multivariable Cox regression models were adjusted for the CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score (age, sex, heart failure, hypertension, stroke, vascular disease, and diabetes). Results Mean age was 54±17 years, 43% were male, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 1.6±1.3. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range 4.3-5.5 years), 36 participants (1.8%) developed stroke. After multivariable adjustment, 2D LA volumes were not associated with stroke, whereas both 3D-LAVimax (HR 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.06), p=0.046, per 1 mL/m2 increase) and 3D-LAVimin (HR 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.08), p=0.002, per 1 mL/m2 increase) remained significantly associated with stroke (Figure 1). In addition, 3D-LAVimin showed the highest discrimination for predicting stroke with a C-statistic of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.59-0.80), which was significantly higher than 2D-LAVimax (C-statistic: 0.58 (95% CI 0.48-0.69); p=0.02), 2D-LAVimin (C-statistic: 0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.65); p<0.001) and 3D-LAVimax (C-statistic: 0.62 (95% CI 0.52-0.73); p=0.004). 3D-LAVimin also showed incremental prognostic information when added to the CHA2DS2-VASc risk score (continuous net reclassification index 0.28±0.17; p=0.047). Conclusion Increasing 3D-LA volumes are significantly associated with higher risk of stroke in the general population which was not the case for 2D-derived LA volumes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.075
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the utility of 3D vs 2D left atrial volumes by echocardiography to predict stroke in the general population

P Soegaard, R Moegelvang, Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup, Mats Lassen et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Comparing the utility of 3D vs 2D left atrial volumes by echocardiography to predict stroke in the general population

P Soegaard, R Moegelvang, Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup, Mats Lassen, N Dyrby Johansen, Gorm Boje Jensen, T Biering-Soerensen, Peter Schnohr, Marat Yafasov, F J Olsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Left atrial (LA) volume dilatation is associated with stroke in the general population. Two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is commonly used to measure LA size but is known to underestimate LA volumes compared to three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE). It is unknown whether this difference has clinical significance. Purpose We hypothesized that LA volumes by 3DE are more closely associated with stroke risk than 2DE in the general population. Methods We included 2,085 participants from a longitudinal cohort study from the general population who underwent 3DE and 2DE assessment of maximal and minimal LA volume index (LAVimax and LAVimin, respectively). After excluding participants with poor image quality, low volume rate, atrial fibrillation at baseline and non-sinus-rhythm during examination, a total of 1,956 participants were included for this analysis. The endpoint was stroke. Multivariable Cox regression models were adjusted for the CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score (age, sex, heart failure, hypertension, stroke, vascular disease, and diabetes). Results Mean age was 54±17 years, 43% were male, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 1.6±1.3. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range 4.3-5.5 years), 36 participants (1.8%) developed stroke. After multivariable adjustment, 2D LA volumes were not associated with stroke, whereas both 3D-LAVimax (HR 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.06), p=0.046, per 1 mL/m2 increase) and 3D-LAVimin (HR 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.08), p=0.002, per 1 mL/m2 increase) remained significantly associated with stroke (Figure 1). In addition, 3D-LAVimin showed the highest discrimination for predicting stroke with a C-statistic of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.59-0.80), which was significantly higher than 2D-LAVimax (C-statistic: 0.58 (95% CI 0.48-0.69); p=0.02), 2D-LAVimin (C-statistic: 0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.65); p<0.001) and 3D-LAVimax (C-statistic: 0.62 (95% CI 0.52-0.73); p=0.004). 3D-LAVimin also showed incremental prognostic information when added to the CHA2DS2-VASc risk score (continuous net reclassification index 0.28±0.17; p=0.047). Conclusion Increasing 3D-LA volumes are significantly associated with higher risk of stroke in the general population which was not the case for 2D-derived LA volumes.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.