Prognostic and diagnostic implications of impaired rest and exercise-stress left atrial compliance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the HFpEF Stress Trial

Abstract Background With emerging therapies, early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) comes to the fore. Whilst the reference standard of exercise-stress right heart catheterisation is well established, the clinical routine struggles between feasibility of exercise-stress and diagnostic accuracy of available tests. Methods The HFpEF Stress Trial (DZHK-17) prospectively enrolled 75 patients with exertional dyspnoea and echocardiographic signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e’>8) who underwent simultaneous rest and exercise-stress echocardiography and RHC. HFpEF was defined according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (HFpEF: PCWP rest: ≥15mmHg stress: ≥25mmHg). Patients were classified as non-cardiac dyspnoea (NCD) in the absence of HFpEF and cardiovascular disease. LA compliance was defined as reservoir strain (Es)/(E/e’). Follow-up was conducted after 4 years to evaluate cardiovascular hospitalisation (CVH). Results The final study population included 68 patients (HFpEF n=34 and NCD n=34) of which 23 reached the clinical endpoint, 1 Patient was lost to follow-up. Patients with HFpEF according to the HFA-PEFF score (≥5 points) had significantly lower LA compliance at rest (p<0.001) compared to patients with a score ≤4. LA compliance at rest outperformed E/e’ (AUC 0.78 vs 0.87, p=0.024) and showed a statistical trend to outperform Es (AUC 0.79 vs 0.87, p=0.090) for the diagnosis of HFpEF. LA compliance at rest predicted CVH (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.70-4.74, p<0.001) irrespective of concomitant atrial fibrillation. Conclusions LA compliance at rest can be obtained from clinical routine imaging and bears strong diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Addition of LA compliance can improve the role of echocardiography as the primary test and gatekeeper.