Comparative analysis of multi-organ failure trajectories reflected by the MELD-3.0 following heart transplantation and heartmate 3 implantation

Abstract Background Multi-organ failure (MOF) frequently complicates advanced heart failure (HF), substantially impacting patient prognosis. The Model of End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0 (MELD-3.0) scale, encompassing liver and kidney function parameters, is a valuable tool for assessing the severity of organ dysfunction. Purpose This study aims to elucidate the trajectory of MOF in individuals undergoing either heart transplantation (HTx) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) - HeartMate 3 implantation, utilizing the MELD-3.0 scale, over a 1-year follow-up period. Methods A comprehensive analysis was conducted, examining data from 1 month preceding to 1 year subsequent to the HTx or LVAD implantation. The MELD-3.0 score was calculated using the average values of international normalized ratio, bilirubin, creatinine, sodium, and albumin levels during this timeframe. Comparative assessments of the average MELD-3.0 scores were performed between the HTx and LVAD groups at 1 month pre-procedure, as well as at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-procedure. Results The analysis included 107 patients undergoing HTx and 31 patients undergoing HMi, with a median age of 54 years (47-62), 85% were male. There was no difference in MELD-3.0 between HTx and LVAD patients in the pre-procedure period: 12.3 (7.3-15.9) vs 13.1 (7.7-16.6), p=0.95. There was also no difference in MELD-3.0 at 1 week and 1 month post-procedure. However, in the 3rd month, the difference gained statistical significance: 7.3 (4.6-9.4) vs 13.8 (11.5-19.7), p<0.01 and continued to be significant in the next follow-ups: 12-month 5.4 (3.1-10.2) vs 11.1 (6.7—15.1), p<0.01, comparing respectively HTx vs LVAD. In both groups of patients, a significant decrease in MELD-3.0 score from 3-month follow-up when compared to 1 month preceding the procedure was observed. Within 12 months post-procedure, 30 patients (22%) died (19 in HTx group and 11 in LVAD group), 8 LVAD patients (26%) had HTx. Conclusion The utilization of the MELD-3.0 scale reveals significant differences in the trajectory of multi-organ failure between HTx and LVAD patients. Both forms of advanced HF therapy result in an improvement of liver and kidney condition, while HTx patients' benefits are larger and last longer, highlighting the distinct impacts of this intervention on organ function.MELD 3.0 score in time

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1134
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of multi-organ failure trajectories reflected by the MELD-3.0 following heart transplantation and heartmate 3 implantation

Magdalena Cielecka, R. Mania, Roman Przybylski, Jakub Ptak et al.
European Heart Journal
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Comparative analysis of multi-organ failure trajectories reflected by the MELD-3.0 following heart transplantation and heartmate 3 implantation

Magdalena Cielecka, R. Mania, Roman Przybylski, Jakub Ptak, Aycan Bölük, Michał Zakliczyńśki, Małgorzata Makieła, Kamil Wiśniewski, Maciej Bochenek, Mateusz Sokolski, Joanna Gontarczyk, P Byszuk, M Szwajkowski, Mateusz Waloszczyk
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Multi-organ failure (MOF) frequently complicates advanced heart failure (HF), substantially impacting patient prognosis. The Model of End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0 (MELD-3.0) scale, encompassing liver and kidney function parameters, is a valuable tool for assessing the severity of organ dysfunction. Purpose This study aims to elucidate the trajectory of MOF in individuals undergoing either heart transplantation (HTx) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) - HeartMate 3 implantation, utilizing the MELD-3.0 scale, over a 1-year follow-up period. Methods A comprehensive analysis was conducted, examining data from 1 month preceding to 1 year subsequent to the HTx or LVAD implantation. The MELD-3.0 score was calculated using the average values of international normalized ratio, bilirubin, creatinine, sodium, and albumin levels during this timeframe. Comparative assessments of the average MELD-3.0 scores were performed between the HTx and LVAD groups at 1 month pre-procedure, as well as at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-procedure. Results The analysis included 107 patients undergoing HTx and 31 patients undergoing HMi, with a median age of 54 years (47-62), 85% were male. There was no difference in MELD-3.0 between HTx and LVAD patients in the pre-procedure period: 12.3 (7.3-15.9) vs 13.1 (7.7-16.6), p=0.95. There was also no difference in MELD-3.0 at 1 week and 1 month post-procedure. However, in the 3rd month, the difference gained statistical significance: 7.3 (4.6-9.4) vs 13.8 (11.5-19.7), p<0.01 and continued to be significant in the next follow-ups: 12-month 5.4 (3.1-10.2) vs 11.1 (6.7—15.1), p<0.01, comparing respectively HTx vs LVAD. In both groups of patients, a significant decrease in MELD-3.0 score from 3-month follow-up when compared to 1 month preceding the procedure was observed. Within 12 months post-procedure, 30 patients (22%) died (19 in HTx group and 11 in LVAD group), 8 LVAD patients (26%) had HTx. Conclusion The utilization of the MELD-3.0 scale reveals significant differences in the trajectory of multi-organ failure between HTx and LVAD patients. Both forms of advanced HF therapy result in an improvement of liver and kidney condition, while HTx patients' benefits are larger and last longer, highlighting the distinct impacts of this intervention on organ function.MELD 3.0 score in time

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Wroclaw Medical University (PL), University of Zielona Góra (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.