Which echocardiographic measure of longitudinal function is most informative?

Abstract Background The longitudinal function of the left ventricle can be quantified by measuring the myocardial excursion with or without normalising by the diastolic length to derive strain. Furthermore, these lengths can be determined from the curved myocardial length or in a straight-line from the mid-annulus to the apex parallel to the long axis. All four combinations have been advocated and used, but the optimal is unknown. Purpose Compare the prognostic information contained by these four measures of longitudinal function in a large retrospective cohort, with measurements performed by AI. Methods The cohort consisted of echocardiograms performed during 2015 at our institution for which mortality data were available. Our previously published AI based view classifier selected the apical 4-, 2-, and 3-chamber views from each study, before the endocardial contour and annular and apical points were segmented by another neural network. From this the curved and long-axis excursion was calculated, and then strain was derived using the diastolic length. Nested non-linear Cox-models including age and sex and each of the longitudinal measures were constructed, and the information contained by each variable was quantified via Chi-Square and compared using bootstrap methods. Results 1733 patient studies were included, the median age was 64 (IQR 49 to 75) years and 51% were male. A total of 213 (14%) deaths occurred. The median excursion and strains were 3.25 cm (IQR 2.68 to 3.81) and -17% (IQR -20% to -14%) along the endocardial curve and 2.36 cm (IQR 1.88 to 2.87) and -14% (IQR -17% to -11%) along the long axis. All four longitudinal measures significantly added to a base model containing age and sex (p=0.003, p=0.005, p=0.005, p=0.002). Whilst the simple long axis excursion was numerically the most prognostic, none of the measures were significantly different from each other. Conclusions In this head-to-head AI-assisted retrospective cohort study using mortality as the endpoint, there was no good evidence that more complex measures of longitudinal function had better prognostic performance.Information provided by model componentsLong axis excursion calibration curve

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.040
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which echocardiographic measure of longitudinal function is most informative?

Catherine C. Stowell, Tony Ng, Matthew Shun‐Shin, Subarna Bhattacharyya et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Which echocardiographic measure of longitudinal function is most informative?

Catherine C. Stowell, Tony Ng, Matthew Shun‐Shin, Subarna Bhattacharyya, M Alzetani, Camelia Demetrescu, Kenneth Mangion, Amar Singh, Ronak Rajani, Bushra S. Rana, Graham Cole, Adriano Chaves de Almeida, JP Howard, Joban Sehmi, D.P. Francis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The longitudinal function of the left ventricle can be quantified by measuring the myocardial excursion with or without normalising by the diastolic length to derive strain. Furthermore, these lengths can be determined from the curved myocardial length or in a straight-line from the mid-annulus to the apex parallel to the long axis. All four combinations have been advocated and used, but the optimal is unknown. Purpose Compare the prognostic information contained by these four measures of longitudinal function in a large retrospective cohort, with measurements performed by AI. Methods The cohort consisted of echocardiograms performed during 2015 at our institution for which mortality data were available. Our previously published AI based view classifier selected the apical 4-, 2-, and 3-chamber views from each study, before the endocardial contour and annular and apical points were segmented by another neural network. From this the curved and long-axis excursion was calculated, and then strain was derived using the diastolic length. Nested non-linear Cox-models including age and sex and each of the longitudinal measures were constructed, and the information contained by each variable was quantified via Chi-Square and compared using bootstrap methods. Results 1733 patient studies were included, the median age was 64 (IQR 49 to 75) years and 51% were male. A total of 213 (14%) deaths occurred. The median excursion and strains were 3.25 cm (IQR 2.68 to 3.81) and -17% (IQR -20% to -14%) along the endocardial curve and 2.36 cm (IQR 1.88 to 2.87) and -14% (IQR -17% to -11%) along the long axis. All four longitudinal measures significantly added to a base model containing age and sex (p=0.003, p=0.005, p=0.005, p=0.002). Whilst the simple long axis excursion was numerically the most prognostic, none of the measures were significantly different from each other. Conclusions In this head-to-head AI-assisted retrospective cohort study using mortality as the endpoint, there was no good evidence that more complex measures of longitudinal function had better prognostic performance.Information provided by model componentsLong axis excursion calibration curve

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB), King's College London (GB), Universidade Federal de Sergipe (BR), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Hammersmith Hospital (GB), Luton and Dunstable Hospital (GB), Charing Cross Hospital (GB), Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.