Right atrial strain: the hidden proof of bi-atrial cardiomyopathy in AF patients?

Abstract Background Although assessment of left atrium (LA) abnormalities has been extensively studied in atrial fibrillation (AF), structural and functional changes in the right atrium (RA) have remained almost unexplored in this context. Purpose We investigated the role of bi-atrial strain in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation (CA). Methods Fifty-six consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF were prospectively studied with speckle-tracking echocardiography and electrophysiological study, before and after CA (median follow-up: 7±3 months). A group of 32 subjects undergoing CA of paroxysmal atrioventricular node-reentrant tachycardia, without structural heart disease, served as control group. Results Patients with AF had worse LA, but also RA strain indexes compared to controls [RA strain parameters: peak RAS reservoir (pRASr): 22.1±12.6 vs 29.8±12.7%, p=0.009; RA dispersion: SD-regional-RA-time-to-peak (SD-regional-RA-TTP): 0.048±0.015 vs 0.038±0.009, p=0.020)]. Patients with persistent AF showed similar LA strain values, but worse RA strain indexes, compared to patients with paroxysmal AF (pRASr: 24.8±12.1 vs 15.9±11.7%,p=0.017; SD-regional-RA-TTP:0.043±0.023 vs 0.062±0.030, p=0.016). RA function showed a significant relation with both LA strain and volume indexes and with abnormal LA electroanatomical substrate (pRASr and pLASr, Pearson correlation: r 0.594, p< 0.001; pRASr and low-voltage LA area: -0.316, p=0.018). RA, but not LA, parameters were found significantly reduced in patients with AF recurrence post-CA compared to those who maintain sinus rhythm (pRASr: 14.1±11.7 vs 24.6±13.5, p=0.039; SD-regional-RA-TTP: 0.054±0.031 vs 0.032±0.010, p=0.002), while the only independent clinical predictor of AF recurrence remained cardiovascular risk profile (CHA2DS2 VASc Score: HR 1.47,CI 1.003-2.158, p= 0.048). Conclusion RA function, as assessed by strain imaging, resulted progressively impaired in worse subtypes of AF, showing a strong correlation with bi-atrial mechanical and electroanatomical parameters, and associated with AF recurrences post-ablation.Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.023
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Right atrial strain: the hidden proof of bi-atrial cardiomyopathy in AF patients?

G Bencardino, Gaetano Pinnacchio, Francesco Perna, Eleonora Ruscio et al.
European Heart Journal
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Right atrial strain: the hidden proof of bi-atrial cardiomyopathy in AF patients?

G Bencardino, Gaetano Pinnacchio, Francesco Perna, Eleonora Ruscio, Federica Giordano, Gemma Pelargonio, Francesco Raffaele Spera, Filippo Crea, F Gabrielli, M L Narducci
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Although assessment of left atrium (LA) abnormalities has been extensively studied in atrial fibrillation (AF), structural and functional changes in the right atrium (RA) have remained almost unexplored in this context. Purpose We investigated the role of bi-atrial strain in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation (CA). Methods Fifty-six consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF were prospectively studied with speckle-tracking echocardiography and electrophysiological study, before and after CA (median follow-up: 7±3 months). A group of 32 subjects undergoing CA of paroxysmal atrioventricular node-reentrant tachycardia, without structural heart disease, served as control group. Results Patients with AF had worse LA, but also RA strain indexes compared to controls [RA strain parameters: peak RAS reservoir (pRASr): 22.1±12.6 vs 29.8±12.7%, p=0.009; RA dispersion: SD-regional-RA-time-to-peak (SD-regional-RA-TTP): 0.048±0.015 vs 0.038±0.009, p=0.020)]. Patients with persistent AF showed similar LA strain values, but worse RA strain indexes, compared to patients with paroxysmal AF (pRASr: 24.8±12.1 vs 15.9±11.7%,p=0.017; SD-regional-RA-TTP:0.043±0.023 vs 0.062±0.030, p=0.016). RA function showed a significant relation with both LA strain and volume indexes and with abnormal LA electroanatomical substrate (pRASr and pLASr, Pearson correlation: r 0.594, p< 0.001; pRASr and low-voltage LA area: -0.316, p=0.018). RA, but not LA, parameters were found significantly reduced in patients with AF recurrence post-CA compared to those who maintain sinus rhythm (pRASr: 14.1±11.7 vs 24.6±13.5, p=0.039; SD-regional-RA-TTP: 0.054±0.031 vs 0.032±0.010, p=0.002), while the only independent clinical predictor of AF recurrence remained cardiovascular risk profile (CHA2DS2 VASc Score: HR 1.47,CI 1.003-2.158, p= 0.048). Conclusion RA function, as assessed by strain imaging, resulted progressively impaired in worse subtypes of AF, showing a strong correlation with bi-atrial mechanical and electroanatomical parameters, and associated with AF recurrences post-ablation.Graphical Abstract

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), University of the Sacred Heart (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.