FLOWERS AEP: An Analytical Model for Wind Farm Layout Optimization

ABSTRACT Annual energy production (AEP) is commonly used in objective functions for wind farm layout optimization. AEP is proportional to wind farm power production integrated over an annual distribution of free‐stream wind conditions. Physics‐based estimates of wind farm power production typically rely on low‐fidelity engineering wake models that approximate the steady‐state wind farm flow field. AEP estimates are then obtained by performing independent simulations for discrete wind conditions and using rectangular quadrature to account for each condition's expected frequency of occurrence. Depending on the number of simulated discrete wind conditions, this numerical integral could be hampered by poor accuracy or high computational costs. The FLOWERS AEP model instead poses an analytical integral of the engineering wake model over the variable wind conditions, yielding a closed‐form, analytical function for wind farm AEP. This paper derives the analytical functions for FLOWERS AEP and its derivatives with respect to turbine position, which are useful for gradient‐based wind farm layout optimization, in nondimensional form. We then analyze the benefits of the FLOWERS AEP model over conventional reference models, focusing on its low cost, adequate wake loss predictions, and smooth design space. Although the FLOWERS approach is found to predict the exact value of AEP with some error relative to the reference model (within 14% on average), it dramatically reduces computation time by an order of magnitude, produces a qualitatively similar design space at relatively low resolution, and yields comparable optimal layouts. This significant speed improvement is critical in layout optimization applications, where determining an optimal layout in an efficient manner is more important than precise AEP prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wind Energy
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2954
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wind Energy Research and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FLOWERS AEP: An Analytical Model for Wind Farm Layout Optimization

Luis A. Martínez‐Tossas, Catherine Gorlé, Michael J. LoCascio, Majid Bastankhah et al.
3 citations
Wind Energy
Wind Energy Research and Development
3.90
article

FLOWERS AEP: An Analytical Model for Wind Farm Layout Optimization

Luis A. Martínez‐Tossas, Catherine Gorlé, Michael J. LoCascio, Majid Bastankhah, Christopher J. Bay
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Annual energy production (AEP) is commonly used in objective functions for wind farm layout optimization. AEP is proportional to wind farm power production integrated over an annual distribution of free‐stream wind conditions. Physics‐based estimates of wind farm power production typically rely on low‐fidelity engineering wake models that approximate the steady‐state wind farm flow field. AEP estimates are then obtained by performing independent simulations for discrete wind conditions and using rectangular quadrature to account for each condition's expected frequency of occurrence. Depending on the number of simulated discrete wind conditions, this numerical integral could be hampered by poor accuracy or high computational costs. The FLOWERS AEP model instead poses an analytical integral of the engineering wake model over the variable wind conditions, yielding a closed‐form, analytical function for wind farm AEP. This paper derives the analytical functions for FLOWERS AEP and its derivatives with respect to turbine position, which are useful for gradient‐based wind farm layout optimization, in nondimensional form. We then analyze the benefits of the FLOWERS AEP model over conventional reference models, focusing on its low cost, adequate wake loss predictions, and smooth design space. Although the FLOWERS approach is found to predict the exact value of AEP with some error relative to the reference model (within 14% on average), it dramatically reduces computation time by an order of magnitude, produces a qualitatively similar design space at relatively low resolution, and yields comparable optimal layouts. This significant speed improvement is critical in layout optimization applications, where determining an optimal layout in an efficient manner is more important than precise AEP prediction.

Wind EnergyVol. 27(12)
National Laboratory of the Rockies (US), Durham University (GB), Stanford University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Wind Energy Technologies Office, Office of Energy Efficiency
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Wind Energy Research and Development
3.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.