Pre‐Vegetation Mixed (Wave‐Tide) Energy Trangressive Nearshore Sedimentation: Evidence From the Proterozoic Passive Margin Sequence of <scp>NW</scp> Himalaya, India

ABSTRACT The coupled evolution of the Earth's atmosphere–biosphere system through time has caused irreversible changes in the geodynamics as well as surface processes and sedimentation patterns. One such significant change took place in sedimentation in the Palaeozoic (i.e., Silurian) by the appearance of vascular vegetation. While the impact of evolving vegetation on the terrestrial fluvial environment has been relatively well documented, vegetation‐induced effects down the system in marginal or nearshore marine settings have undergone little study. The Meso‐ to Neoproterozoic Rautgara Formation exposed in the Himalayan Orogenic Belt of NW India, offers a chance to study a well‐preserved fluvial–marine transition to nearshore sedimentation before the appearance of vascular vegetation. A detailed sedimentological analysis identifies six genetically linked facies associations (FA) probably deposited in barrier, back‐barrier, and subtidal deltaic environments. Contrary to the other transgressive barrier models (where beach‐barrier overlie the back barrier environments), in the present case, wave‐dominated barrier deposits mostly occupy the basal part of the stratigraphy. In the middle stratigraphic level, back‐barrier deposits lack thick mud flats and show a dominance of sandstone over mudstone. Stacked subtidal sand bar facies association represents the top part of the sequence. Two sequence stratigraphic surfaces, that is, subaerial unconformity and maximum flooding surface, have been identified and the whole succession is interpreted in terms of HST and TST. Barrier and back‐barrier sediments are deposited during HST and TST, respectively. Subtidal deltaic system developed in late TST. The lack of frequent interbedding between the barrier and back‐barrier facies indicates negligible landward migration of the barrier and demonstrates system stability. The barrier system might have resulted from vertical aggradations akin to modern vegetated systems. The study portrays that sandy barrier systems are common in the Proterozoic. Vegetation and thick mud flats are not always essential for the stability of a barrier‐beach system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geological Journal
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.5078
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geological formations and processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre‐Vegetation Mixed (Wave‐Tide) Energy Trangressive Nearshore Sedimentation: Evidence From the Proterozoic Passive Margin Sequence of NW Himalaya, India

Subhojit Saha
4 citations
Geological Journal
Geological formations and processes
2.06
article

Pre‐Vegetation Mixed (Wave‐Tide) Energy Trangressive Nearshore Sedimentation: Evidence From the Proterozoic Passive Margin Sequence of NW Himalaya, India

Subhojit Saha
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The coupled evolution of the Earth's atmosphere–biosphere system through time has caused irreversible changes in the geodynamics as well as surface processes and sedimentation patterns. One such significant change took place in sedimentation in the Palaeozoic (i.e., Silurian) by the appearance of vascular vegetation. While the impact of evolving vegetation on the terrestrial fluvial environment has been relatively well documented, vegetation‐induced effects down the system in marginal or nearshore marine settings have undergone little study. The Meso‐ to Neoproterozoic Rautgara Formation exposed in the Himalayan Orogenic Belt of NW India, offers a chance to study a well‐preserved fluvial–marine transition to nearshore sedimentation before the appearance of vascular vegetation. A detailed sedimentological analysis identifies six genetically linked facies associations (FA) probably deposited in barrier, back‐barrier, and subtidal deltaic environments. Contrary to the other transgressive barrier models (where beach‐barrier overlie the back barrier environments), in the present case, wave‐dominated barrier deposits mostly occupy the basal part of the stratigraphy. In the middle stratigraphic level, back‐barrier deposits lack thick mud flats and show a dominance of sandstone over mudstone. Stacked subtidal sand bar facies association represents the top part of the sequence. Two sequence stratigraphic surfaces, that is, subaerial unconformity and maximum flooding surface, have been identified and the whole succession is interpreted in terms of HST and TST. Barrier and back‐barrier sediments are deposited during HST and TST, respectively. Subtidal deltaic system developed in late TST. The lack of frequent interbedding between the barrier and back‐barrier facies indicates negligible landward migration of the barrier and demonstrates system stability. The barrier system might have resulted from vertical aggradations akin to modern vegetated systems. The study portrays that sandy barrier systems are common in the Proterozoic. Vegetation and thick mud flats are not always essential for the stability of a barrier‐beach system.

Geological JournalVol. 60(2)
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology (IN)
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Geological formations and processes
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.