On current problems of the mechanism of liability of judges for disciplinary misconduct: law enforcement practice, general approachesPart 4. Approaches to improving and improving the efficiency of the organizational and legal mechanism of disciplinar

In the final, fourth part of the article, published in 2024 in the journal “State and Law”, certain results of the problems considered in its first three parts are summed up (part 1 – “Termination of the powers of a judge for a serious offense after the constitutional innovations of 2020 – constitutional or disciplinary responsibility?” (No. 3); part 2 – “On problems of disciplinary responsibility of court heads” (in two sections) (No. 4, 5); part 3 – “On the disciplinary responsibility of retired judges” (No. 6)). Conclusions are drawn about the imperfection of this mechanism with specific examples of law enforcement (and especially judicial) practice, including those caused by the imperfection of legislation in the area of public relations under consideration. Specific, including radical, proposals are being made aimed at improving and increasing the effectiveness of both the named mechanism as a whole and its individual links.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gosudarstvo i pravo
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31857/s1026945224080063
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On current problems of the mechanism of liability of judges for disciplinary misconduct: law enforcement practice, general approachesPart 4. Approaches to improving and improving the efficiency of the organizational and legal mechanism of disciplinar

Mikhail I. Kleandrov
Gosudarstvo i pravo
Education, Law, and Society
article

On current problems of the mechanism of liability of judges for disciplinary misconduct: law enforcement practice, general approachesPart 4. Approaches to improving and improving the efficiency of the organizational and legal mechanism of disciplinar

Mikhail I. Kleandrov
article en

Abstract

In the final, fourth part of the article, published in 2024 in the journal “State and Law”, certain results of the problems considered in its first three parts are summed up (part 1 – “Termination of the powers of a judge for a serious offense after the constitutional innovations of 2020 – constitutional or disciplinary responsibility?” (No. 3); part 2 – “On problems of disciplinary responsibility of court heads” (in two sections) (No. 4, 5); part 3 – “On the disciplinary responsibility of retired judges” (No. 6)). Conclusions are drawn about the imperfection of this mechanism with specific examples of law enforcement (and especially judicial) practice, including those caused by the imperfection of legislation in the area of public relations under consideration. Specific, including radical, proposals are being made aimed at improving and increasing the effectiveness of both the named mechanism as a whole and its individual links.

Gosudarstvo i pravo(8)
Institute of State and Law (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.