The Impact of Major Powers on Security Council Decisions

The research examines the impact of major powers on the work of the Security Council and its impact on international politics. The research emphasizes that the five permanent members of the Council (the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom) have veto power, which allows them to prevent any decision even if it has the support of the majority. Major Powers utilize this power strategically to direct international policies according to their interests, which leads to influencing decisions related to international peace and security. The research also identifies how geopolitical balances and strategic interests can sometimes explain the lack of consensus in the Council’s decisions. In addition, the research discusses criticisms of the present structure of the Security Council. It shows reform calls aimed at improving international representation and reducing the influence of major powers to ensure greater effectiveness and justice in dealing with global crises.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecohumanism
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4482
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Major Powers on Security Council Decisions

Haidar Salem Abdul Husein, Osama Murtadha Baqir
Journal of Ecohumanism
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

The Impact of Major Powers on Security Council Decisions

Haidar Salem Abdul Husein, Osama Murtadha Baqir
article en

Abstract

The research examines the impact of major powers on the work of the Security Council and its impact on international politics. The research emphasizes that the five permanent members of the Council (the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom) have veto power, which allows them to prevent any decision even if it has the support of the majority. Major Powers utilize this power strategically to direct international policies according to their interests, which leads to influencing decisions related to international peace and security. The research also identifies how geopolitical balances and strategic interests can sometimes explain the lack of consensus in the Council’s decisions. In addition, the research discusses criticisms of the present structure of the Security Council. It shows reform calls aimed at improving international representation and reducing the influence of major powers to ensure greater effectiveness and justice in dealing with global crises.

Journal of EcohumanismVol. 3(7)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.