H.L.A. Hart's Lost Essay on Policies, Principles, and Adjudication

Abstract This introductory essay accompanies the publication of H.L.A. Hart’s “Policies, Principles, and Adjudication,” which I uncovered amongst Ronald Dworkin’s papers at Yale. Hart’s previously unpublished paper was composed between 1977 and 1982 and delivered at a seminar at Oxford. It offers an extended critique of Dworkin’s conception of “policies” in his Taking Rights Seriously. This critique is not reproduced elsewhere in Hart’s published work. The paper also provides an expanded version of Hart’s thoughts, in his “Postscript” to The Concept of Law, on judicial reasoning by analogy and the phenomenology of judicial decision-making. Hart’s essay adds significantly to our understanding of the so-called “Hart-Dworkin debate,” around which much of contemporary Anglophone jurisprudence continues to be structured.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Jurisprudence
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auae015
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

H.L.A. Hart's Lost Essay on Policies, Principles, and Adjudication

Samuel Burry
The American Journal of Jurisprudence
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

H.L.A. Hart's Lost Essay on Policies, Principles, and Adjudication

Samuel Burry
article en

Abstract

Abstract This introductory essay accompanies the publication of H.L.A. Hart’s “Policies, Principles, and Adjudication,” which I uncovered amongst Ronald Dworkin’s papers at Yale. Hart’s previously unpublished paper was composed between 1977 and 1982 and delivered at a seminar at Oxford. It offers an extended critique of Dworkin’s conception of “policies” in his Taking Rights Seriously. This critique is not reproduced elsewhere in Hart’s published work. The paper also provides an expanded version of Hart’s thoughts, in his “Postscript” to The Concept of Law, on judicial reasoning by analogy and the phenomenology of judicial decision-making. Hart’s essay adds significantly to our understanding of the so-called “Hart-Dworkin debate,” around which much of contemporary Anglophone jurisprudence continues to be structured.

The American Journal of JurisprudenceVol. 69(2)
University of Oxford (GB)
Yale University
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.