International Journal for Advanced Research in Science & Technology

Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant potential in multilingual machine translation (MMT).This paper systematically explores the advantages and challenges of LLMs in this domain by addressing two key questions: 1) How effectively do LLMs translate a wide range of languages?2) What factors influence their translation performance?We assess popular LLMs, including XGLM, OPT, BLOOMZ, and ChatGPT, across 102 languages.Our empirical findings reveal that even the top-performing model, ChatGPT, falls short of the supervised baseline NLLB in 83.33% of translation tasks.Further analysis uncovers new patterns in LLM behavior during MMT.First, the semantics of prompts can be largely disregarded when using in-context examples, as LLMs maintain strong performance even with nonsensical prompts.Second, cross-lingual examples often provide superior task guidance for low-resource translations compared to same-language pairs.Lastly, we find that BLOOMZ's performance on the Flores-101 dataset may be overestimated, highlighting potential risks associated with using public datasets for evaluation.

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48047/ijarst/v14/i10/25
Primary Topic
Internet of Things and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Journal for Advanced Research in Science & Technology

Internet of Things and AI
article

International Journal for Advanced Research in Science & Technology

article en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant potential in multilingual machine translation (MMT).This paper systematically explores the advantages and challenges of LLMs in this domain by addressing two key questions: 1) How effectively do LLMs translate a wide range of languages?2) What factors influence their translation performance?We assess popular LLMs, including XGLM, OPT, BLOOMZ, and ChatGPT, across 102 languages.Our empirical findings reveal that even the top-performing model, ChatGPT, falls short of the supervised baseline NLLB in 83.33% of translation tasks.Further analysis uncovers new patterns in LLM behavior during MMT.First, the semantics of prompts can be largely disregarded when using in-context examples, as LLMs maintain strong performance even with nonsensical prompts.Second, cross-lingual examples often provide superior task guidance for low-resource translations compared to same-language pairs.Lastly, we find that BLOOMZ's performance on the Flores-101 dataset may be overestimated, highlighting potential risks associated with using public datasets for evaluation.

Vol. 14(10)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Internet of Things and AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

International Journal for Advanced Research in Science & Technology · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS