Dorsal fin height is not an effective tool to distinguish hatchery and wild steelhead in the field

Abstract Objective To maximize harvest of hatchery steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss and Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. while reducing impacts to wild conspecifics, fishery managers rely on the ability of anglers to distinguish between the two. Fin erosion, including dorsal fin erosion, is a common result of hatchery rearing of juvenile salmonids. Since the 1980s, managers in the Pacific Northwest have utilized adult steelhead dorsal fin height as a regulatory control rule, requiring anglers to release steelhead with dorsal fins over a height threshold. This approach assumes that all or most hatchery fish have shorter dorsal fins than their wild counterparts. This study was designed to test this assumption. Methods We compared steelhead origin (hatchery or wild) determined using scale analysis and adipose fin clipping (hatchery n = 127, wild n = 71) with origin estimated using dorsal fin height. Result Overall, a static dorsal fin height threshold (2.25 in, 5.72 cm) correctly identified 90% of hatchery-origin steelhead but misidentified nearly half (44%) of wild fish as hatchery. Dorsal fin height of known hatchery fish correlated with fish length, indicating a weakness of using a static dorsal height threshold as a management tool. The accuracy of distinguishing wild fish improved, but only marginally (56–76%), using a classification model where dorsal fin height of known origin fish from this study was a continuous predictor of origin. In comparison, adipose fin status correctly identified 97% of unmarked fish as wild. Conclusion The low accuracy of the classification model and static dorsal fin height thresholds at distinguishing hatchery and wild steelhead due to a strong correlation between dorsal fin height and fork length and the high fork length variability of hatchery origin fish. Given the low cost and accuracy of adipose fin clipping and the potentially high conservation risk associated with misidentification, we recommend discontinuing the use of dorsal fin height as a harvest control rule for steelhead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.11037
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dorsal fin height is not an effective tool to distinguish hatchery and wild steelhead in the field

Erin M. Witkop, Todd R. Seamons, Kathryn T. Sutton, James P. Losee et al.
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

Dorsal fin height is not an effective tool to distinguish hatchery and wild steelhead in the field

Erin M. Witkop, Todd R. Seamons, Kathryn T. Sutton, James P. Losee, R N Allan, Andrew M. Claiborne
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To maximize harvest of hatchery steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss and Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. while reducing impacts to wild conspecifics, fishery managers rely on the ability of anglers to distinguish between the two. Fin erosion, including dorsal fin erosion, is a common result of hatchery rearing of juvenile salmonids. Since the 1980s, managers in the Pacific Northwest have utilized adult steelhead dorsal fin height as a regulatory control rule, requiring anglers to release steelhead with dorsal fins over a height threshold. This approach assumes that all or most hatchery fish have shorter dorsal fins than their wild counterparts. This study was designed to test this assumption. Methods We compared steelhead origin (hatchery or wild) determined using scale analysis and adipose fin clipping (hatchery n = 127, wild n = 71) with origin estimated using dorsal fin height. Result Overall, a static dorsal fin height threshold (2.25 in, 5.72 cm) correctly identified 90% of hatchery-origin steelhead but misidentified nearly half (44%) of wild fish as hatchery. Dorsal fin height of known hatchery fish correlated with fish length, indicating a weakness of using a static dorsal height threshold as a management tool. The accuracy of distinguishing wild fish improved, but only marginally (56–76%), using a classification model where dorsal fin height of known origin fish from this study was a continuous predictor of origin. In comparison, adipose fin status correctly identified 97% of unmarked fish as wild. Conclusion The low accuracy of the classification model and static dorsal fin height thresholds at distinguishing hatchery and wild steelhead due to a strong correlation between dorsal fin height and fork length and the high fork length variability of hatchery origin fish. Given the low cost and accuracy of adipose fin clipping and the potentially high conservation risk associated with misidentification, we recommend discontinuing the use of dorsal fin height as a harvest control rule for steelhead.

North American Journal of Fisheries ManagementVol. 44(5)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (US)
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.