Critical systems thinking for managing complexity of food security

Abstract Reductionist approaches, conventionally used to address the complexities of food security, successfully addressed production challenges throughout the 20th century. However, this approach met its limitations when addressing broader issues encompassing socio‐economic and sustainability. Additionally, this approach tends to equip us with reactive methods rather than prescriptive, while decision‐makers today are encouraged to take anticipatory plans and act quickly in any situation. This paper tries to manage the complexity of food security using critical system thinking to assist decision‐makers in choosing a system approach relevant to the issue. It started by presenting the evolution of food security complexity by documenting significant historical milestones in the global journey of global food security. Furthermore, we associate the outcomes of each milestone, in this case, the World Food Conference/Summit, in shaping the direction of the global research theme. We also interview stakeholders from government, businesses and NGOs to identify the complexity of food practices based on their perspectives. Lastly, we categorize food security issues into six types of complexity by referring to Jackson. We show how system of systems methodology (SOSM) can enable us to frame the complexity of food security into relevant categories equipped with suggested methods, thereby enabling the allocation of resources and time more effectively and efficiently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3088
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical systems thinking for managing complexity of food security

Santi Novani, Utomo Sarjono Putro, Agung Hendriadi, Valid Hasyimi
4 citations
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Complex Systems and Decision Making
1.96
article

Critical systems thinking for managing complexity of food security

Santi Novani, Utomo Sarjono Putro, Agung Hendriadi, Valid Hasyimi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Reductionist approaches, conventionally used to address the complexities of food security, successfully addressed production challenges throughout the 20th century. However, this approach met its limitations when addressing broader issues encompassing socio‐economic and sustainability. Additionally, this approach tends to equip us with reactive methods rather than prescriptive, while decision‐makers today are encouraged to take anticipatory plans and act quickly in any situation. This paper tries to manage the complexity of food security using critical system thinking to assist decision‐makers in choosing a system approach relevant to the issue. It started by presenting the evolution of food security complexity by documenting significant historical milestones in the global journey of global food security. Furthermore, we associate the outcomes of each milestone, in this case, the World Food Conference/Summit, in shaping the direction of the global research theme. We also interview stakeholders from government, businesses and NGOs to identify the complexity of food practices based on their perspectives. Lastly, we categorize food security issues into six types of complexity by referring to Jackson. We show how system of systems methodology (SOSM) can enable us to frame the complexity of food security into relevant categories equipped with suggested methods, thereby enabling the allocation of resources and time more effectively and efficiently.

Systems Research and Behavioral ScienceVol. 42(6)
Bandung Institute of Technology (ID), National Research and Innovation Agency (ID)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Critical systems thinking for managing complexity of food security — Santi Novani, Utomo Sarjono Putro, et al. · Systems Research and Behavioral Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS