Comparison of AHA/ACC and ESC guidelines for the management of patients with stable coronary heart disease: same goal, unique perspectives

Currently, there are two updated guidelines (The 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA and the 2024 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines) (1,2) dedicated to stable coronary artery disease (CAD), with different definitions.While the first defines chronic coronary disease, the latter employs a different terminology, chronic coronary syndromes, based on expanded pathophysiological concepts, including microcirculatory disease.Nonetheless, both are devoted to offering insights into the best patient management strategies available.Regarding diagnostic testing, both guidelines stress the importance of clinical and risk factor evaluation for the assessment of the likelihood of CAD, which will influence the choice of noninvasive tests-either anatomic or functional, along with specific patient characteristics that may affect the performance of each type of noninvasive test, as well as local expertise and test availability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heart Vessels and Transplantation
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24969/hvt.2024.523
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of AHA/ACC and ESC guidelines for the management of patients with stable coronary heart disease: same goal, unique perspectives

Andrea De Lorenzo
Heart Vessels and Transplantation
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Comparison of AHA/ACC and ESC guidelines for the management of patients with stable coronary heart disease: same goal, unique perspectives

Andrea De Lorenzo
article en

Abstract

Currently, there are two updated guidelines (The 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA and the 2024 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines) (1,2) dedicated to stable coronary artery disease (CAD), with different definitions.While the first defines chronic coronary disease, the latter employs a different terminology, chronic coronary syndromes, based on expanded pathophysiological concepts, including microcirculatory disease.Nonetheless, both are devoted to offering insights into the best patient management strategies available.Regarding diagnostic testing, both guidelines stress the importance of clinical and risk factor evaluation for the assessment of the likelihood of CAD, which will influence the choice of noninvasive tests-either anatomic or functional, along with specific patient characteristics that may affect the performance of each type of noninvasive test, as well as local expertise and test availability.

Heart Vessels and TransplantationVol. 0(Ahead of Print)
Nuclear Engineering Institute (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.