Integration of plant and microbial oil processing at oilcane biorefineries for more sustainable biofuel production

Abstract Oilcane—an oil‐accumulating crop engineered from sugarcane—and microbial oil have the potential to improve renewable oil production and help meet the expected demand for bioderived oleochemicals and fuels. To assess the potential synergies of processing both plant and microbial oils, the economic and environmental implications of integrating microbial oil production at oilcane and sugarcane biorefineries were characterized. Due to decreased crop yields that lead to higher simulated feedstock prices and lower biorefinery capacities, current oilcane prototypes result in higher costs and carbon intensities than microbial oil from sugarcane. To inform oilcane feedstock development, we calculated the required biomass yields (as a function of oil content) for oilcane to achieve financial parity with sugarcane. At 10 dw% oil, oilcane can sustain up to 30% less yield than sugarcane and still be more profitable in all simulated scenarios. Assuming continued improvements in microbial oil production from cane juice, achieving this target results in a minimum biodiesel selling price of 1.34 [0.90, 1.85] USD∙L −1 (presented as median [5th, 95th] percentiles), a carbon intensity of 0.51 [0.47, 0.55] kg CO 2 e L −1 , and a total biodiesel yield of 2140 [1870, 2410] L ha −1 year −1 . Compared to biofuel production from soybean, this outcome is equivalent to 3.0–3.9 as much biofuel per hectare of land and a 57%–63% reduction in carbon intensity. While only 20% of simulated scenarios fell within the market price range of biodiesel (0.45–1.11 USD∙L −1 ), if the oilcane biomass yield would improve to 25.6 DMT∙ha −1 ∙y −1 (an equivalent yield to sugarcane) 87% of evaluated scenarios would have a minimum biodiesel selling price within or below the market price range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GCB Bioenergy
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13183
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Biofuel production and bioconversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of plant and microbial oil processing at oilcane biorefineries for more sustainable biofuel production

Vijay Singh, Jeremy S. Guest, Christopher V. Rao, Shivali Banerjee et al.
7 citations
GCB Bioenergy
Biofuel production and bioconversion
1.29
article

Integration of plant and microbial oil processing at oilcane biorefineries for more sustainable biofuel production

Vijay Singh, Jeremy S. Guest, Christopher V. Rao, Shivali Banerjee, William H. Woodruff, Yoel R. Cortés‐Peña, Yalin Li
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Oilcane—an oil‐accumulating crop engineered from sugarcane—and microbial oil have the potential to improve renewable oil production and help meet the expected demand for bioderived oleochemicals and fuels. To assess the potential synergies of processing both plant and microbial oils, the economic and environmental implications of integrating microbial oil production at oilcane and sugarcane biorefineries were characterized. Due to decreased crop yields that lead to higher simulated feedstock prices and lower biorefinery capacities, current oilcane prototypes result in higher costs and carbon intensities than microbial oil from sugarcane. To inform oilcane feedstock development, we calculated the required biomass yields (as a function of oil content) for oilcane to achieve financial parity with sugarcane. At 10 dw% oil, oilcane can sustain up to 30% less yield than sugarcane and still be more profitable in all simulated scenarios. Assuming continued improvements in microbial oil production from cane juice, achieving this target results in a minimum biodiesel selling price of 1.34 [0.90, 1.85] USD∙L −1 (presented as median [5th, 95th] percentiles), a carbon intensity of 0.51 [0.47, 0.55] kg CO 2 e L −1 , and a total biodiesel yield of 2140 [1870, 2410] L ha −1 year −1 . Compared to biofuel production from soybean, this outcome is equivalent to 3.0–3.9 as much biofuel per hectare of land and a 57%–63% reduction in carbon intensity. While only 20% of simulated scenarios fell within the market price range of biodiesel (0.45–1.11 USD∙L −1 ), if the oilcane biomass yield would improve to 25.6 DMT∙ha −1 ∙y −1 (an equivalent yield to sugarcane) 87% of evaluated scenarios would have a minimum biodiesel selling price within or below the market price range.

GCB BioenergyVol. 16(11)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Biofuel production and bioconversion
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.