A Representation Theorem for Causal Decision Making
We show that it is possible to understand and identify a decision maker’s subjective causal judgements by observing her preferences over interventions. Following Pearl [2000, DOI: doi.org/10.1017/S0266466603004109 ], we represent causality using causal models (also called structural equations models), where the world is described by a collection of variables, related by equations. We show that if a preference relation over interventions satisfies certain axioms (related to standard axioms regarding counterfactuals), then we can define (i) a causal model, (ii) a probability capturing the decision-maker’s uncertainty regarding the external factors in the world and (iii) a utility on outcomes such that each intervention is associated with an expected utility and such that intervention A is preferred to B iff the expected utility of A is greater than that of B. In addition, we characterize when the causal model is unique. Thus, our results allow a modeler to test the hypothesis that a decision maker’s preferences are consistent with some causal model and to identify causal judgements from observed behavior.
Authors
- Evan Piermont (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4189-5504)
- Joseph Y. Halpern (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9229-1663)
Institutions
- Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
- Cornell University (US)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-10-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2024/39
- Primary Topic
- Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Open Philanthropy Project
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
- Army Research Office