“Unduly Harsh?”: An Empirical Examination of Best Interests Assessments in the Context of Parental Deportation

Abstract Thousands of people are deported from the UK every year, having served a sentence for a serious criminal offence, it being determined that it is no longer in the public interest for them to remain in the UK. For those who are parents, they can appeal against deportation on grounds that it would breach their right to family life and have an unduly harsh impact on their children. Detailed guidance has emerged, setting out the factors that should be taken into account in determining this question in a manner that is compliant with children’s rights. Drawing on an in-depth analysis of a sample of deportation case files, this paper provides a unique empirical insight into the extent to which this guidance is applied in practice, with a particular reference to children’s rights principles and processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Children s Rights
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-32030013
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Unduly Harsh?”: An Empirical Examination of Best Interests Assessments in the Context of Parental Deportation

Nazia Yaqub, Sarah Woodhouse, Helen Stalford͌, Melanie Griffiths et al.
2 citations
The International Journal of Children s Rights
Migration, Health and Trauma
1.28
article

“Unduly Harsh?”: An Empirical Examination of Best Interests Assessments in the Context of Parental Deportation

Nazia Yaqub, Sarah Woodhouse, Helen Stalford͌, Melanie Griffiths, Naomi Jackson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Thousands of people are deported from the UK every year, having served a sentence for a serious criminal offence, it being determined that it is no longer in the public interest for them to remain in the UK. For those who are parents, they can appeal against deportation on grounds that it would breach their right to family life and have an unduly harsh impact on their children. Detailed guidance has emerged, setting out the factors that should be taken into account in determining this question in a manner that is compliant with children’s rights. Drawing on an in-depth analysis of a sample of deportation case files, this paper provides a unique empirical insight into the extent to which this guidance is applied in practice, with a particular reference to children’s rights principles and processes.

The International Journal of Children s RightsVol. 32(3)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Migration, Health and Trauma
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.