Assessing The Impact Of Procrastination On Workplace Efficiency And Employee Performance

Background: Procrastination with self-regulation, motivation, and emotional control as its underlying causes is a psychological issue, in addition to being a mere time management problem (Metin et al., 2016). Procrastination at work takes many forms, like employees extending deadlines, postponing their assignments, or instead of their primary responsibilities, focussing on unimportant activities. Procrastination is a serious issue that can hinder organisational success aside from being a personal struggle for employees. Organisations can boost outcomes for performance, promote a more dynamic and productive work setting, and improve employee well-being by employing targeted strategies and interventions to address procrastination. This study's main goal is to assess procrastination and how it affects efficiency at work and the performance of an employee at work, with an emphasis on finding the critical elements that influence this habit and its effects in organisational contexts. Material and Method: This research is based on secondary data. The qualitative research is done using articles which are published in academic journals of repute. The care is taken to refer only latest articles unless the article is seminal or of great importance. Results: The results indicate that procrastination significantly hampers work performance and engagement, driven by psychological factors like anxiety, environmental distractions, and organizational shortcomings such as unclear goals. Addressing these factors through engagement strategies, clear objectives, and economic incentives can reduce procrastination, leading to improved productivity and a more motivated workforce. Conclusion: Procrastination negatively impacts performance, work engagement, and productivity. Addressing it requires understanding psychological, environmental, and organizational factors. Enhancing work engagement and clear goals, reducing distractions, and providing economic incentives can mitigate procrastination. By focusing on these aspects, organizations can boost productivity and foster a more efficient, motivated workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-1505050109
Primary Topic
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing The Impact Of Procrastination On Workplace Efficiency And Employee Performance

Mannat Bhutani
IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
article

Assessing The Impact Of Procrastination On Workplace Efficiency And Employee Performance

Mannat Bhutani
article en

Abstract

Background: Procrastination with self-regulation, motivation, and emotional control as its underlying causes is a psychological issue, in addition to being a mere time management problem (Metin et al., 2016). Procrastination at work takes many forms, like employees extending deadlines, postponing their assignments, or instead of their primary responsibilities, focussing on unimportant activities. Procrastination is a serious issue that can hinder organisational success aside from being a personal struggle for employees. Organisations can boost outcomes for performance, promote a more dynamic and productive work setting, and improve employee well-being by employing targeted strategies and interventions to address procrastination. This study's main goal is to assess procrastination and how it affects efficiency at work and the performance of an employee at work, with an emphasis on finding the critical elements that influence this habit and its effects in organisational contexts. Material and Method: This research is based on secondary data. The qualitative research is done using articles which are published in academic journals of repute. The care is taken to refer only latest articles unless the article is seminal or of great importance. Results: The results indicate that procrastination significantly hampers work performance and engagement, driven by psychological factors like anxiety, environmental distractions, and organizational shortcomings such as unclear goals. Addressing these factors through engagement strategies, clear objectives, and economic incentives can reduce procrastination, leading to improved productivity and a more motivated workforce. Conclusion: Procrastination negatively impacts performance, work engagement, and productivity. Addressing it requires understanding psychological, environmental, and organizational factors. Enhancing work engagement and clear goals, reducing distractions, and providing economic incentives can mitigate procrastination. By focusing on these aspects, organizations can boost productivity and foster a more efficient, motivated workforce.

IOSR Journal of Economics and FinanceVol. 15(5)
The English Modern School (QA)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing The Impact Of Procrastination On Workplace Efficiency And Employee Performance — Mannat Bhutani · IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS