Patterns and trends of global social media censorship: Insights from 76 countries

We investigated global social media censorship trends in this research, addressing three essential scholarly gaps: (a) Variations in censorship across countries, (b) the platforms most heavily impacted, and (c) the evolution of censorship over time. With a focus on eight frequently targeted platforms—Facebook, YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, Telegram, Twitter, and Reddit—we scrutinized 360 instances of social media censorship spanning 76 countries from 2006 to 2023. Our findings illustrate a growing governmental control, particularly noticeable in the Global South, with Turkey (6.39%), Sri Lanka (6.11%), Venezuela (5.56%), and Pakistan (5%) at the top of the list of frequently censoring countries. Among the platforms, Facebook (22.22%) and YouTube (21.94%) bear the brunt. Moreover, the escalating control over social media since 2018 signals an emergent global digital authoritarianism. Discernible geographical disparities in platform-specific restrictions prompt reflection on the nexus between censorship and political motivations. Additionally, our results suggest a plausible correlation between censorship practices and prevailing political systems. Enhanced comprehension of this problem could be derived from an augmented focus on the underlying reasons for censorship. This study offers a foundational evaluation of global social media censorship, setting it apart from internet censorship and laying the groundwork for further exploration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Communication Gazette
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485241288768
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns and trends of global social media censorship: Insights from 76 countries

Md. Sayeed Al-Zaman
3 citations
International Communication Gazette
Media Influence and Politics
3.40
article

Patterns and trends of global social media censorship: Insights from 76 countries

Md. Sayeed Al-Zaman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We investigated global social media censorship trends in this research, addressing three essential scholarly gaps: (a) Variations in censorship across countries, (b) the platforms most heavily impacted, and (c) the evolution of censorship over time. With a focus on eight frequently targeted platforms—Facebook, YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, Telegram, Twitter, and Reddit—we scrutinized 360 instances of social media censorship spanning 76 countries from 2006 to 2023. Our findings illustrate a growing governmental control, particularly noticeable in the Global South, with Turkey (6.39%), Sri Lanka (6.11%), Venezuela (5.56%), and Pakistan (5%) at the top of the list of frequently censoring countries. Among the platforms, Facebook (22.22%) and YouTube (21.94%) bear the brunt. Moreover, the escalating control over social media since 2018 signals an emergent global digital authoritarianism. Discernible geographical disparities in platform-specific restrictions prompt reflection on the nexus between censorship and political motivations. Additionally, our results suggest a plausible correlation between censorship practices and prevailing political systems. Enhanced comprehension of this problem could be derived from an augmented focus on the underlying reasons for censorship. This study offers a foundational evaluation of global social media censorship, setting it apart from internet censorship and laying the groundwork for further exploration.

International Communication GazetteVol. 87(5)
Jahangirnagar University (BD)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Media Influence and Politics
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.