Exploring Stable Meta-Optimization Patterns via Differentiable Reinforcement Learning for Few-Shot Classification
Existing few-shot learning methods generally focus on designing exquisite structures of meta-learners for learning task-specific prior to improve the discriminative ability of global embeddings. However, they often ignore the importance of learning stability in meta-training, making it difficult to obtain a relatively optimal model. From this key observation, we propose an innovative generic differentiable Reinforcement Learning (RL) strategy for few-shot classification. It aims to explore stable meta-optimization patterns in meta-training by learning generalizable optimizations for producing task-adaptive embeddings. Accordingly, our differentiable RL strategy models the embedding procedure of feature transformation layers in meta-learner to optimize the gradient flow implicitly. Also, we propose a memory module to associate historical and current task states and actions for exploring inter-task similarity. Notably, our RL-based strategy can be easily extended to various backbones. In addition, we propose a novel task state encoder to encode task representation, which fully explores inner-task similarities between support set and query set. Extensive experiments verify that our approach can improve the performance of different backbones and achieve promising results against state-of-the-art methods in few-shot classification.
Authors
- Chun Hung Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6297-4500)
- Hongyang Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4705-9304)
- Jingyan Qin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-4316)
- Xu-Cheng Yin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0023-0220)
- Xiaobin Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2702-4136)
- Zheng Han (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2584-5187)
Institutions
- University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-10-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3664647.3680933
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.35