Tracing Training Progress: Dynamic Influence Based Selection for Active Learning

Active learning (AL) aims to select highly informative data points from an unlabeled dataset for annotation, mitigating the need for extensive human labeling effort. However, classical AL methods heavily rely on human expertise to design the sampling strategy, inducing limited scalability and generalizability. Many efforts have sought to address this limitation by directly connecting sample selection with model performance improvement, typically through influence function. Nevertheless, these approaches often ignore the dynamic nature of model behavior during training optimization, despite empirical evidence highlights the importance of dynamic influence to track the sample contribution. This oversight can lead to suboptimal selection, hindering the generalizability of model. In this study, we explore the dynamic influence based data selection strategy by tracing the impact of unlabeled instances on model performance throughout the training process. Our theoretical analyses suggest that selecting samples with higher projected gradients along the accumulated optimization direction at each checkpoint leads to improved performance. Furthermore, to capture a wider range of training dynamics without incurring excessive computational or memory costs, we introduce an additional dynamic loss term designed to encapsulate more generalized training progress information. These insights are integrated into a universal and task-agnostic AL framework termed Dynamic Influence Scoring for Active Learning (DISAL). Comprehensive experiments across various tasks have demonstrated that DISAL significantly surpasses existing state-of-the-art AL methods, demonstrating its ability to facilitate more efficient and effective learning in different domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3664647.3681501
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracing Training Progress: Dynamic Influence Based Selection for Active Learning

Kele Xu, Zijian Gao, Dawei Feng, Long Lan et al.
3 citations
Machine Learning and Algorithms
1.04
article

Tracing Training Progress: Dynamic Influence Based Selection for Active Learning

Kele Xu, Zijian Gao, Dawei Feng, Long Lan, Tianjiao Wan, Bo Ding, Huaimin Wang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Active learning (AL) aims to select highly informative data points from an unlabeled dataset for annotation, mitigating the need for extensive human labeling effort. However, classical AL methods heavily rely on human expertise to design the sampling strategy, inducing limited scalability and generalizability. Many efforts have sought to address this limitation by directly connecting sample selection with model performance improvement, typically through influence function. Nevertheless, these approaches often ignore the dynamic nature of model behavior during training optimization, despite empirical evidence highlights the importance of dynamic influence to track the sample contribution. This oversight can lead to suboptimal selection, hindering the generalizability of model. In this study, we explore the dynamic influence based data selection strategy by tracing the impact of unlabeled instances on model performance throughout the training process. Our theoretical analyses suggest that selecting samples with higher projected gradients along the accumulated optimization direction at each checkpoint leads to improved performance. Furthermore, to capture a wider range of training dynamics without incurring excessive computational or memory costs, we introduce an additional dynamic loss term designed to encapsulate more generalized training progress information. These insights are integrated into a universal and task-agnostic AL framework termed Dynamic Influence Scoring for Active Learning (DISAL). Comprehensive experiments across various tasks have demonstrated that DISAL significantly surpasses existing state-of-the-art AL methods, demonstrating its ability to facilitate more efficient and effective learning in different domains.

National University of Defense Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Machine Learning and Algorithms
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.