Direct oral anticoagulant approvals by four major regulatory agencies: a cross-sectional analysis of premarket and postmarket evidence
There was a high degree of concordance in the phase 3 trial premarket evidence used to establish efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulant approvals across four major regulatory agencies, but discordance in the phase 2 trial premarket evidence used, as well as in postmarket safety boxed warnings and postmarketing study requirements. These discrepancies highlight opportunities for further harmonisation in the evaluation and regulation of medical products globally.
Authors
- Tianna Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8170-1612)
- Joseph S. Ross (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9218-3320)
- Maryam Mooghali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9347-494X)
Institutions
- Yale University (US)
- Yale New Haven Health System (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMJ Open
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090376
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.40
Funders
- Yale University
- Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation