Beyond the Win–Win Discourse: Designing Seaweed Farming for Long‐Term Success

ABSTRACT Communication about seaweed aquaculture has so far been dominated by its many socio‐economic and ecological advantages. A key risk of this ‘hype’ is the potential loss of support from communities affected by seaweed cultivation if reality fails to live up to expectations. This could have justice and equity implications for impacted communities, and undermine potential benefits for those communities, as well as affecting the long‐term success of emerging industries. This paper highlights experiences from other marine sectors in which a similar emphasis on benefits has drowned out discussion of potential costs, often leading to initial success but long‐term failure. We highlight the importance of clearly communicating possible negative impacts, and meaningfully engaging stakeholders to shape marine interventions. Finally, we recommend further research into the social dimensions of seaweed farming in geographies where this practice is nascent, and increased attention to the potential trade‐offs of scaling up seaweed cultivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reviews in Aquaculture
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12984
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Win–Win Discourse: Designing Seaweed Farming for Long‐Term Success

Carly L. Daniels, Giorgio Nicolini, Ian Ashton, Tomas Chaigneau et al.
Reviews in Aquaculture
Coastal and Marine Management
article

Beyond the Win–Win Discourse: Designing Seaweed Farming for Long‐Term Success

Carly L. Daniels, Giorgio Nicolini, Ian Ashton, Tomas Chaigneau, Katharine Orchel
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Communication about seaweed aquaculture has so far been dominated by its many socio‐economic and ecological advantages. A key risk of this ‘hype’ is the potential loss of support from communities affected by seaweed cultivation if reality fails to live up to expectations. This could have justice and equity implications for impacted communities, and undermine potential benefits for those communities, as well as affecting the long‐term success of emerging industries. This paper highlights experiences from other marine sectors in which a similar emphasis on benefits has drowned out discussion of potential costs, often leading to initial success but long‐term failure. We highlight the importance of clearly communicating possible negative impacts, and meaningfully engaging stakeholders to shape marine interventions. Finally, we recommend further research into the social dimensions of seaweed farming in geographies where this practice is nascent, and increased attention to the potential trade‐offs of scaling up seaweed cultivation.

Reviews in AquacultureVol. 17(1)
University of Exeter (GB), The National Lobster Hatchery (GB)
European Maritime and Fisheries Fund
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.