Linguistic Uniscape: A Comparative Study of Universities in Thailand

Abstract This study examines the linguistic landscape ( ll ) of university campuses in Thailand and proposes the term “linguistic uniscape” ( lu ). It attempts to examine whether there is a significant difference in the code preference for signage between the public universities ( puu s) and the private universities ( pru s) in Thailand and examines the different social meanings of the signage at the puu s and at the pru s by using place semiotics ( ps ) theory. A total of 30 university campuses were investigated, including 15 puu s and 15 pru s. The results revealed a significant difference in the use of English as the preferred language on the signage at the two types of universities. The signage at both types of universities revealed the different social meanings in language policy, institutional policy, and identity constructions. The puu s focused on academic development, while the pru s focused on the students’ social activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Manusya Journal of Humanities
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-20242707
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguistic Uniscape: A Comparative Study of Universities in Thailand

Zhaoyi Pan
5 citations
Manusya Journal of Humanities
Multilingual Education and Policy
9.42
article

Linguistic Uniscape: A Comparative Study of Universities in Thailand

Zhaoyi Pan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the linguistic landscape ( ll ) of university campuses in Thailand and proposes the term “linguistic uniscape” ( lu ). It attempts to examine whether there is a significant difference in the code preference for signage between the public universities ( puu s) and the private universities ( pru s) in Thailand and examines the different social meanings of the signage at the puu s and at the pru s by using place semiotics ( ps ) theory. A total of 30 university campuses were investigated, including 15 puu s and 15 pru s. The results revealed a significant difference in the use of English as the preferred language on the signage at the two types of universities. The signage at both types of universities revealed the different social meanings in language policy, institutional policy, and identity constructions. The puu s focused on academic development, while the pru s focused on the students’ social activities.

Manusya Journal of HumanitiesVol. 27(1)
King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Multilingual Education and Policy
9.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.