Introducing listening as a weak method for advancing sustainability and interdisciplinary scholarship

Abstract There is now widespread recognition of the need for inter/transdisciplinary (I/TD) approaches to solving global problems like climate change and biodiversity. Yet methods for successfully integrating knowledge across disciplines, and between research and practice, are in need of further development, particularly approaches that can ameliorate epistemological and ontological divides. Here we propose a framework for good listening as a ‘weak method’ that can provide guidance and structure to I/TD collaborations, but does not assume the form and goals a given collaboration will take. Synthesising the results of a scoping, interdisciplinary literature review, we highlight four key components of listening—receiving, processing, interpretation, and feedback/response—and provide a set of normative values regarding ‘good listening’ for each. Our goal is to provide a framework that is grounded in detailed scholarly discussions of listening politics and practice, but that is specifically formulated in response to the needs and concerns of I/TD researchers. We then apply our framework to four commonly encountered challenges in sustainability science, drawing on our collective experience in the field to explore how good listening can aid I/TD collaboration in regards to inclusion, group dynamics, format and pace. In doing so, we hope to inspire those working in sustainability science to approach I/TD collaboration in a new way and provide a tool for facilitating caring and transformational approaches to solving the world’s most pressing sustainability crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Science
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01571-w
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introducing listening as a weak method for advancing sustainability and interdisciplinary scholarship

Megan Maurer, Christopher M. Raymond, Anton Stahl Olafsson, Timon McPhearson et al.
5 citations
Sustainability Science
Environmental Education and Sustainability
3.55
article

Introducing listening as a weak method for advancing sustainability and interdisciplinary scholarship

Megan Maurer, Christopher M. Raymond, Anton Stahl Olafsson, Timon McPhearson, Natalie Marie Gulsrud, Erik Andersson, Maija Faehnle, Artur Branny
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is now widespread recognition of the need for inter/transdisciplinary (I/TD) approaches to solving global problems like climate change and biodiversity. Yet methods for successfully integrating knowledge across disciplines, and between research and practice, are in need of further development, particularly approaches that can ameliorate epistemological and ontological divides. Here we propose a framework for good listening as a ‘weak method’ that can provide guidance and structure to I/TD collaborations, but does not assume the form and goals a given collaboration will take. Synthesising the results of a scoping, interdisciplinary literature review, we highlight four key components of listening—receiving, processing, interpretation, and feedback/response—and provide a set of normative values regarding ‘good listening’ for each. Our goal is to provide a framework that is grounded in detailed scholarly discussions of listening politics and practice, but that is specifically formulated in response to the needs and concerns of I/TD researchers. We then apply our framework to four commonly encountered challenges in sustainability science, drawing on our collective experience in the field to explore how good listening can aid I/TD collaboration in regards to inclusion, group dynamics, format and pace. In doing so, we hope to inspire those working in sustainability science to approach I/TD collaboration in a new way and provide a tool for facilitating caring and transformational approaches to solving the world’s most pressing sustainability crises.

Sustainability ScienceVol. 20(1)
The New School (US), University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Helsinki (FI), Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE), Stockholm University (SE), Geological Society of America (US), North-West University (ZA), Finnish Environment Institute (FI), Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US)
National Science Foundation, NordForsk, Stockholms Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
3.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.