Scaffolding Bad Moral Agents

Abstract Recent work on ecological accounts of moral responsibility and agency have argued for the importance of social environments for moral reasons responsiveness. Moral audiences can scaffold individual agents’ sensitivity to moral reasons and their motivation to act on them, but they can also undermine it. In this paper, we look at two case studies of ‘scaffolding bad’, where moral agency is undermined by social environments: street gangs and online incel communities. In discussing these case studies, we draw both on recent situated cognition literature and on scaffolded responsibility theory. We show that the way individuals are embedded into a specific social environment changes the moral considerations they are sensitive to in systematic ways because of the way these environments scaffold affective and cognitive processes, specifically those that concern the perception and treatment of ingroups and outgroups. We argue that gangs undermine reasons responsiveness to a greater extent than incel communities because gang members are more thoroughly immersed in the gang environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Topoi
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10110-2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaffolding Bad Moral Agents

Jan-Hendrik Heinrichs, Anneli Jefferson, Katrina L. Sifferd
3 citations
Topoi
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
1.03
article

Scaffolding Bad Moral Agents

Jan-Hendrik Heinrichs, Anneli Jefferson, Katrina L. Sifferd
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Recent work on ecological accounts of moral responsibility and agency have argued for the importance of social environments for moral reasons responsiveness. Moral audiences can scaffold individual agents’ sensitivity to moral reasons and their motivation to act on them, but they can also undermine it. In this paper, we look at two case studies of ‘scaffolding bad’, where moral agency is undermined by social environments: street gangs and online incel communities. In discussing these case studies, we draw both on recent situated cognition literature and on scaffolded responsibility theory. We show that the way individuals are embedded into a specific social environment changes the moral considerations they are sensitive to in systematic ways because of the way these environments scaffold affective and cognitive processes, specifically those that concern the perception and treatment of ingroups and outgroups. We argue that gangs undermine reasons responsiveness to a greater extent than incel communities because gang members are more thoroughly immersed in the gang environment.

TopoiVol. 44(2)
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Elmhurst University (US), Cardiff University (GB), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scaffolding Bad Moral Agents — Jan-Hendrik Heinrichs, Anneli Jefferson, et al. · Topoi (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS