Intergroup Conflict Over Climate Change: Problems and Solutions

ABSTRACT Global progress in combatting climate change is being slowed by intergroup conflict and tribalism. Addressing the intergroup tensions of today is a pre‐requisite for avoiding violent intergroup tensions in the future, tensions that may threaten societal structures we currently take for granted. This paper highlights five sources of intergroup conflict that compromise humans’ ability to effectively and swiftly respond to climate change: political tribalism, populist suspicion of elites, regional differences within nations, international conflicts, and tensions between and within activist identities. We then draw on established and emerging social psychological theorising to describe five strategies for constructively managing this intergroup conflict: maintaining climate justice, reducing disinformation and silencing bad‐faith actors, maintaining cohesion among progressive forces, focusing on trusted messengers, and empathic communication. Throughout we underscore the extent to which policy making and strategic communication can play roles in depolarising debate about climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3127
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intergroup Conflict Over Climate Change: Problems and Solutions

Matthew J. Hornsey, Kelly S. Fielding, Winnifred R. Louis, George C. Marshall
11 citations
European Journal of Social Psychology
Climate Change and Geoengineering
3.11
article

Intergroup Conflict Over Climate Change: Problems and Solutions

Matthew J. Hornsey, Kelly S. Fielding, Winnifred R. Louis, George C. Marshall
article en
11 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Global progress in combatting climate change is being slowed by intergroup conflict and tribalism. Addressing the intergroup tensions of today is a pre‐requisite for avoiding violent intergroup tensions in the future, tensions that may threaten societal structures we currently take for granted. This paper highlights five sources of intergroup conflict that compromise humans’ ability to effectively and swiftly respond to climate change: political tribalism, populist suspicion of elites, regional differences within nations, international conflicts, and tensions between and within activist identities. We then draw on established and emerging social psychological theorising to describe five strategies for constructively managing this intergroup conflict: maintaining climate justice, reducing disinformation and silencing bad‐faith actors, maintaining cohesion among progressive forces, focusing on trusted messengers, and empathic communication. Throughout we underscore the extent to which policy making and strategic communication can play roles in depolarising debate about climate change.

European Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 55(2)
The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
3.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intergroup Conflict Over Climate Change: Problems and Solutions — Matthew J. Hornsey, Kelly S. Fielding, et al. · European Journal of Social Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS