Handling missing data in variational autoencoder based item response theory

Recently Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) have been proposed as a method to estimate high dimensional Item Response Theory (IRT) models on large datasets. Although these improve the efficiency of estimation drastically compared to traditional methods, they have no natural way to deal with missing values. In this paper, we adapt three existing methods from the VAE literature to the IRT setting and propose one new method. We compare the performance of the different VAE-based methods to each other and to marginal maximum likelihood estimation for increasing levels of missing data in a simulation study for both three- and ten-dimensional IRT models. Additionally, we demonstrate the use of the VAE-based models on an existing algebra test dataset. Results confirm that VAE-based methods are a time-efficient alternative to marginal maximum likelihood, but that a larger number of importance-weighted samples are needed when the proportion of missing values is large.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12363
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Handling missing data in variational autoencoder based item response theory

Karel Veldkamp, Raoul P. P. P. Grasman, Dylan Molenaar
3 citations
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
1.47
article

Handling missing data in variational autoencoder based item response theory

Karel Veldkamp, Raoul P. P. P. Grasman, Dylan Molenaar
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Recently Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) have been proposed as a method to estimate high dimensional Item Response Theory (IRT) models on large datasets. Although these improve the efficiency of estimation drastically compared to traditional methods, they have no natural way to deal with missing values. In this paper, we adapt three existing methods from the VAE literature to the IRT setting and propose one new method. We compare the performance of the different VAE-based methods to each other and to marginal maximum likelihood estimation for increasing levels of missing data in a simulation study for both three- and ten-dimensional IRT models. Additionally, we demonstrate the use of the VAE-based models on an existing algebra test dataset. Results confirm that VAE-based methods are a time-efficient alternative to marginal maximum likelihood, but that a larger number of importance-weighted samples are needed when the proportion of missing values is large.

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical PsychologyVol. 78(1)
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Handling missing data in variational autoencoder based item response theory — Karel Veldkamp, Raoul P. P. P. Grasman, et al. · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS