A Qualitative Study Exploring the Process of Turning a Mixed Methods Doctoral Dissertation Into a Journal Article: Perspectives From Recent Doctorates in the United States

Despite guidelines on mixed methods writing practices, the process of turning a mixed methods dissertation into a peer-reviewed publication is unknown, which may hinder scientific advancements and the use of mixed methods research across disciplines. This qualitative study explored recent doctorates’ experiences across three dimensions (i.e., critical decisions about the process, challenges, and recommendations for scholars) through nine semi-structured interviews. We identified themes under each dimension, respectively: (a) considerations for authorship decisions, disentangling the publication process, and the role of support systems; (b) challenges preparing a manuscript for submission and challenges with the journal review process; and (c) the value of time for publication process. This study contributes to the field of mixed methods research by offering empirical evidence and insights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241296907
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Qualitative Study Exploring the Process of Turning a Mixed Methods Doctoral Dissertation Into a Journal Article: Perspectives From Recent Doctorates in the United States

Kathleen McCallops, Sinem Toraman, Michelle Howell Smith, Analay Perez
2 citations
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
1.70
article

A Qualitative Study Exploring the Process of Turning a Mixed Methods Doctoral Dissertation Into a Journal Article: Perspectives From Recent Doctorates in the United States

Kathleen McCallops, Sinem Toraman, Michelle Howell Smith, Analay Perez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Despite guidelines on mixed methods writing practices, the process of turning a mixed methods dissertation into a peer-reviewed publication is unknown, which may hinder scientific advancements and the use of mixed methods research across disciplines. This qualitative study explored recent doctorates’ experiences across three dimensions (i.e., critical decisions about the process, challenges, and recommendations for scholars) through nine semi-structured interviews. We identified themes under each dimension, respectively: (a) considerations for authorship decisions, disentangling the publication process, and the role of support systems; (b) challenges preparing a manuscript for submission and challenges with the journal review process; and (c) the value of time for publication process. This study contributes to the field of mixed methods research by offering empirical evidence and insights.

Journal of Mixed Methods ResearchVol. 19(3)
University of Michigan (US), Yale University (US), Yale New Haven Health System (US), Empowerment Program (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Qualitative Study Exploring the Process of Turning a Mixed Methods Doctoral Dissertation Into a Journal Article: Perspectives From Recent Doctorates in the United States — Kathleen McCallops, Sinem Toraman, et al. · Journal of Mixed Methods Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS