Political Communication Research is Unprepared for the Far Right

In this introductory piece to a special issue of the Forum, we explore the inadequacies of the field of political communication in addressing the rising threats posed by illiberalism and the far right. We argue that the discipline’s frameworks, developed within the context of Western liberal democracies, are ill-equipped to tackle the complexities and self-reflexive strategies of contemporary far-right movements and actor types. These formations exploit liberal norms and practices to ultimately undermine and dismantle democratic values. We call for more “democratic clarity,” urging political communication scholars to adopt a clear stance in defense of democratic principles and to develop more robust conceptual tools to accurately classify and understand far-right actors. We introduce the other discussion pieces featured in this special section and ultimately point to actionable items meant to move the field forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Communication
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2414268
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political Communication Research is Unprepared for the Far Right

Curd Knüpfer, Sarah J. Jackson, Daniel Kreiss
15 citations
Political Communication
Social Media and Politics
14.36
article

Political Communication Research is Unprepared for the Far Right

Curd Knüpfer, Sarah J. Jackson, Daniel Kreiss
article en
15 citations

Abstract

In this introductory piece to a special issue of the Forum, we explore the inadequacies of the field of political communication in addressing the rising threats posed by illiberalism and the far right. We argue that the discipline’s frameworks, developed within the context of Western liberal democracies, are ill-equipped to tackle the complexities and self-reflexive strategies of contemporary far-right movements and actor types. These formations exploit liberal norms and practices to ultimately undermine and dismantle democratic values. We call for more “democratic clarity,” urging political communication scholars to adopt a clear stance in defense of democratic principles and to develop more robust conceptual tools to accurately classify and understand far-right actors. We introduce the other discussion pieces featured in this special section and ultimately point to actionable items meant to move the field forward.

Political CommunicationVol. 41(6)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Southern Denmark (DK), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Media and Politics
14.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.