Genital coupling and copulatory wounding in the <i>Drosophila rufa</i> species complex: comparison with the <i>D. auraria</i> species complex (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

Abstract In sexually reproducing animals, genital morphology is usually divergent among closely related species, which can lead to a mismatch of genital coupling (i.e. mechanical isolation). The montium species group of the subgenus Sophophora is the largest clade in Drosophila and is a useful model in which to study the evolution of genital morphology. This group includes a pair of sister clades, i.e. the Drosophila auraria and Drosophila rufa species complexes. The former includes four species with overlapping distributions, and the latter consists of five species that are almost allopatric. The previous study on the D. auraria complex suggested genital co-evolution between sexes (female structures accepting for or protecting from male structures). To test the generality, we analysed the D. rufa complex and three outgroup species. In the D. rufa complex, we detected genital structures corresponding between sexes, and copulatory wounds with species-specific positions. Given that approximately the same number of evolutionary changes in the genital traits were detected in both sexes of the two clades, we conclude that selection pressure to avoid interspecific mating (reproductive character displacement) is not a prerequisite for rapid genital co-evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blae093
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insect behavior and control techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genital coupling and copulatory wounding in the Drosophila rufa species complex: comparison with the D. auraria species complex (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

Takeshi Awasaki, Yoshitaka Kamimura, Kyoichi Sawamura, Moe Onuma et al.
1 citations
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Insect behavior and control techniques
0.54
article

Genital coupling and copulatory wounding in the Drosophila rufa species complex: comparison with the D. auraria species complex (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

Takeshi Awasaki, Yoshitaka Kamimura, Kyoichi Sawamura, Moe Onuma, Haruka Omiya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In sexually reproducing animals, genital morphology is usually divergent among closely related species, which can lead to a mismatch of genital coupling (i.e. mechanical isolation). The montium species group of the subgenus Sophophora is the largest clade in Drosophila and is a useful model in which to study the evolution of genital morphology. This group includes a pair of sister clades, i.e. the Drosophila auraria and Drosophila rufa species complexes. The former includes four species with overlapping distributions, and the latter consists of five species that are almost allopatric. The previous study on the D. auraria complex suggested genital co-evolution between sexes (female structures accepting for or protecting from male structures). To test the generality, we analysed the D. rufa complex and three outgroup species. In the D. rufa complex, we detected genital structures corresponding between sexes, and copulatory wounds with species-specific positions. Given that approximately the same number of evolutionary changes in the genital traits were detected in both sexes of the two clades, we conclude that selection pressure to avoid interspecific mating (reproductive character displacement) is not a prerequisite for rapid genital co-evolution.

Biological Journal of the Linnean SocietyVol. 143(2)
University of Tsukuba (JP), Kyorin University (JP), Keio University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Insect behavior and control techniques
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.