<scp>FedEvalFair:</scp> A Privacy-Preserving and Statistically Grounded Federated Fairness Evaluation Framework

Federated learning has rapidly gained attention in the industrial sector due to its significant advantages in protecting privacy. However, ensuring the fairness of federated learning models post-deployment presents a challenge in practical applications. Given that clients typically rely on limited private datasets to assess model fairness, this constrains their ability to make accurate judgments about the fairness of the model. To address this issue, we propose an innovative evaluation framework, FedEvalFair, which integrates private data from multiple clients to comprehensively assess the fairness of models in actual deployment without compromising data privacy. Firstly, FedEvalFair draws on the concept of federated learning to achieve a comprehensive assessment while protecting privacy. Secondly, based on the statistical concept of "estimating the population from the sample", FedEvalFair is capable of estimating the fairness performance of the model in real-world settings from a limited data sample. Thirdly, we have designed a flexible two-stage evaluation strategy based on statistical hypothesis testing. We verified the theoretical performance and sensitivity to fairness variations of FedEvalFair using Monte Carlo simulations, demonstrating the superior performance of its two-stage evaluation strategy. Additionally, we validated the effectiveness of the FedEvalFair method on real-world datasets, including UCI Adult and eICU, and demonstrated its stability in dealing with real-world data distribution changes compared to traditional evaluation methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3664647.3681545
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FedEvalFair: A Privacy-Preserving and Statistically Grounded Federated Fairness Evaluation Framework

Zhongchi Wang, Hailong Sun, Zhao Zhi
1 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
article

FedEvalFair: A Privacy-Preserving and Statistically Grounded Federated Fairness Evaluation Framework

Zhongchi Wang, Hailong Sun, Zhao Zhi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Federated learning has rapidly gained attention in the industrial sector due to its significant advantages in protecting privacy. However, ensuring the fairness of federated learning models post-deployment presents a challenge in practical applications. Given that clients typically rely on limited private datasets to assess model fairness, this constrains their ability to make accurate judgments about the fairness of the model. To address this issue, we propose an innovative evaluation framework, FedEvalFair, which integrates private data from multiple clients to comprehensively assess the fairness of models in actual deployment without compromising data privacy. Firstly, FedEvalFair draws on the concept of federated learning to achieve a comprehensive assessment while protecting privacy. Secondly, based on the statistical concept of "estimating the population from the sample", FedEvalFair is capable of estimating the fairness performance of the model in real-world settings from a limited data sample. Thirdly, we have designed a flexible two-stage evaluation strategy based on statistical hypothesis testing. We verified the theoretical performance and sensitivity to fairness variations of FedEvalFair using Monte Carlo simulations, demonstrating the superior performance of its two-stage evaluation strategy. Additionally, we validated the effectiveness of the FedEvalFair method on real-world datasets, including UCI Adult and eICU, and demonstrated its stability in dealing with real-world data distribution changes compared to traditional evaluation methods.

Beihang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.