Spatial Variation in Upper Limits of Coral Cover on the Great Barrier Reef

ABSTRACT Aim Identifying the maximum coral cover that a coral community can sustain (i.e., its ‘upper limit’) is important for predicting community dynamics and improving management strategies. Here, we quantify the relationship between estimated upper limits and key environmental factors on coral reefs: hard substrate availability, temperature and water clarity. Location Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia (over 1400 km). Time Period 1990 to 2022. Major Taxa Studied Scleractinian corals. Methods We used 32 years of data on coral cover around reef perimeters. Each reef was divided into four wave‐exposure habitats depending on prevailing wind conditions. For each site, we determined if hard coral cover had reached a plateau or upper limit. Next, we extracted existing estimates of hard substrate availability, modelled water temperature and Secchi depth. Then, we quantified the relationship between these environmental variables and the upper limits. Results We found varying upper limits across the GBR, with a median of 33% coral cover and only 17% of the estimated upper limits exceeded 50% coral cover. Upper limits increased towards the southern reefs. Our results show that upper limits increased with increasing hard substrate availability and decreased with temperature and, to a lesser extent, with water clarity. Main Conclusions The upper limits estimated in this study are much lower than what is commonly assumed when modelling ecological dynamics, most likely resulting in predicted recovery rates being inappropriately high. Although hard substrate ultimately restricted upper limits, there are mechanisms constraining the proportion of hard substrate that is covered by hard corals. The negative relationship between temperature and upper limits cannot be explained by changes in macroalgal abundance but may be related to changes in species composition. The quantitative relationships between the upper limits of coral cover and environmental variables will provide critical information to prioritise sites for management interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13928
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Variation in Upper Limits of Coral Cover on the Great Barrier Reef

Barbara Robson, Michael J. Emslie, Tane H. Sinclair‐Taylor, Mariana Álvarez‐Noriega et al.
2 citations
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
0.92
article

Spatial Variation in Upper Limits of Coral Cover on the Great Barrier Reef

Barbara Robson, Michael J. Emslie, Tane H. Sinclair‐Taylor, Mariana Álvarez‐Noriega, Katharina Fabricius, Chris Roelfsema, Renata Ferrari, Michelle J. Jonker, Marji Puotinen, Daniela M. Ceccarelli, Juan Carlos Ortiz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Identifying the maximum coral cover that a coral community can sustain (i.e., its ‘upper limit’) is important for predicting community dynamics and improving management strategies. Here, we quantify the relationship between estimated upper limits and key environmental factors on coral reefs: hard substrate availability, temperature and water clarity. Location Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia (over 1400 km). Time Period 1990 to 2022. Major Taxa Studied Scleractinian corals. Methods We used 32 years of data on coral cover around reef perimeters. Each reef was divided into four wave‐exposure habitats depending on prevailing wind conditions. For each site, we determined if hard coral cover had reached a plateau or upper limit. Next, we extracted existing estimates of hard substrate availability, modelled water temperature and Secchi depth. Then, we quantified the relationship between these environmental variables and the upper limits. Results We found varying upper limits across the GBR, with a median of 33% coral cover and only 17% of the estimated upper limits exceeded 50% coral cover. Upper limits increased towards the southern reefs. Our results show that upper limits increased with increasing hard substrate availability and decreased with temperature and, to a lesser extent, with water clarity. Main Conclusions The upper limits estimated in this study are much lower than what is commonly assumed when modelling ecological dynamics, most likely resulting in predicted recovery rates being inappropriately high. Although hard substrate ultimately restricted upper limits, there are mechanisms constraining the proportion of hard substrate that is covered by hard corals. The negative relationship between temperature and upper limits cannot be explained by changes in macroalgal abundance but may be related to changes in species composition. The quantitative relationships between the upper limits of coral cover and environmental variables will provide critical information to prioritise sites for management interventions.

Global Ecology and BiogeographyVol. 33(12)
Australian Institute of Marine Science (AU), The University of Queensland (AU)
Australian Institute of Marine Science
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.