Comparison of a Novel Posterior Integrated Transfixation Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Approach to the Posterolateral and Lateral Approaches: A Cadaveric Biomechanical and Computational Analysis of the Fixation, Invasiveness, and Fusion Area
The posterior integrated transfixation single-implant cage system is superior to the posterolateral cylindrical threaded single-implant system. Its performance in osteopenic bone is equivalent to the lateral triangular rod system in healthy bone; however, the posterior integrated transfixation cage system requires a single implant, while the lateral triangular rod system requires three. The posterior implant removes the least bone volume and has the most surface area for fusion, providing a significantly better opportunity for robust sacroiliac joint arthrodesis.
Authors
- Sarah Mayer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6126-315X)
- David Caraway (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0838-5852)
- Douglas P. Beall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8340-696X)
- Alexander Escobar
- Oluwatodimu Richard Raji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8816-2172)
- Jeremi M. Leasure
- Joshua Tandio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8952-0405)
- Brett A Himmelwright
Institutions
- University of Toledo Medical Center (US)
- California State University, Northridge (US)
- Integrated Device Technology (United States) (US)
- Nevro (United States) (US)
- St. Mary's Medical Center (US)
- Orthopedic Institute (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Medical Devices Evidence and Research
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2147/mder.s474734
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.15
Funders
- Nevro