Dispossession and beyond: Politics of rural land conversion in China's tourism villages

Across the peripheries of global South cities, projects to convert rural land for development purposes have brought dramatic impact on rural communities and environments. Many of these initiatives involve aggregating land, mobilizing investments, and resettling populations, with direct implications for villagers’ land rights and livelihoods. In existing studies, rural land conversions have often been examined through frameworks of “land grabbing” and “dispossession”. This paper argues for the need to go beyond these frameworks in conceptualizing the varied pathways and outcomes of rural land takings. It presents a comparative case study of two villages in China, whose land has been redeployed for tourism development. In one village, state-led expropriation led to the loss of land rights and the resettlement of villagers in new housing complexes. In another, villagers held onto land ownership and their property but saw intra-community inequalities amplified as residents were differentially incorporated into the tourism economy. By demonstrating how the nuanced mechanisms of land conversion could facilitate variegated livelihood and distributive outcomes between and within communities, this paper problematizes universalist conceptualizations of dispossession and calls for theorizing both “with” and “beyond” dispossession to account for the multifaceted dynamics of land development in global South contexts. • Theorizing with and beyond dispossession in rural land politics. • Comparative case study of two tourism villages in suburban China. • Shows how and why rural land conversion produces contrasting local outcomes. • Advances comparative research on land across North-South, rural-urban divide.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103429
Citations
6
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dispossession and beyond: Politics of rural land conversion in China's tourism villages

Karita Kan, Jie Sun
6 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
13.39
article

Dispossession and beyond: Politics of rural land conversion in China's tourism villages

Karita Kan, Jie Sun
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Across the peripheries of global South cities, projects to convert rural land for development purposes have brought dramatic impact on rural communities and environments. Many of these initiatives involve aggregating land, mobilizing investments, and resettling populations, with direct implications for villagers’ land rights and livelihoods. In existing studies, rural land conversions have often been examined through frameworks of “land grabbing” and “dispossession”. This paper argues for the need to go beyond these frameworks in conceptualizing the varied pathways and outcomes of rural land takings. It presents a comparative case study of two villages in China, whose land has been redeployed for tourism development. In one village, state-led expropriation led to the loss of land rights and the resettlement of villagers in new housing complexes. In another, villagers held onto land ownership and their property but saw intra-community inequalities amplified as residents were differentially incorporated into the tourism economy. By demonstrating how the nuanced mechanisms of land conversion could facilitate variegated livelihood and distributive outcomes between and within communities, this paper problematizes universalist conceptualizations of dispossession and calls for theorizing both “with” and “beyond” dispossession to account for the multifaceted dynamics of land development in global South contexts. • Theorizing with and beyond dispossession in rural land politics. • Comparative case study of two tourism villages in suburban China. • Shows how and why rural land conversion produces contrasting local outcomes. • Advances comparative research on land across North-South, rural-urban divide.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 112
Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
13.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dispossession and beyond: Politics of rural land conversion in China's tourism villages — Karita Kan, Jie Sun · Journal of Rural Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS