Effectiveness of the Emergency Severity Index in Early Identification of Sepsis in a Tertiary Care Hospital of a Low-resource Setting

Background: Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction, and a global issue, with incidence and mortality are around 49 M cases in 2017. Annual sepsis incidence from Pakistan is around 1600-2500 per 100, 000 cases with high mortality of approx. 30%. This huge mortality among sepsis and septic shock cases from low-income settings it is necessary to implement a focused and effective triage tool to prioritize and categorize the sick patients from huge bulk of sick patients who attend the ED and to identify those who need to be seen and manage accordingly. Emergency severity index (ESI), a widely acceptable tool that was developed to assess illness severity, hence able to identify the sick patients that need immediate attention at triage. Objectives: Our objective is to determine the effectiveness of ESI triage acuity in early recognition of patient with sepsis and septic shock at triage in a busy ED. Methods: This was a single center, cross sectional and observational study, we include 240 cases who present to the ED of a tertiary care hospital. We follow ESI v. 4.0. All cases presenting to the ED with suspected diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock were included. Data was collected on a predesigned data sheet. Participants were followed by their electronic medical record number through patient care information software where patient’s medical diagnosis and discharge diagnosis are present. Results: Total of 240 patients in the inclusion criteria, area under curve (AUC) for the ESI score I, for septic shock was 0.943 [0.921 - 0.964] with the optimal cutoff value of 2.0, sensitivity of 88.5% and specificity 100%. Similarly, the receiver operating curve (ROC) with area under the curve of ESI Score II for sepsis is found 0.2 [0.129-0.270] with sensitivity 23% and specificity was 12.7%. Conclusion: ESI is a reliable tool which is both sensitive and specific in screening patients with septic shock in a busy emergency department.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrid/2024/v15i11391
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of the Emergency Severity Index in Early Identification of Sepsis in a Tertiary Care Hospital of a Low-resource Setting

Noor Baig, Nazir Najeeb Kapadia, Tooba Siddiqui, Noman Ali et al.
Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Effectiveness of the Emergency Severity Index in Early Identification of Sepsis in a Tertiary Care Hospital of a Low-resource Setting

Noor Baig, Nazir Najeeb Kapadia, Tooba Siddiqui, Noman Ali, Ahmed Raheem, Emad Uddin Siddiqui
article en

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction, and a global issue, with incidence and mortality are around 49 M cases in 2017. Annual sepsis incidence from Pakistan is around 1600-2500 per 100, 000 cases with high mortality of approx. 30%. This huge mortality among sepsis and septic shock cases from low-income settings it is necessary to implement a focused and effective triage tool to prioritize and categorize the sick patients from huge bulk of sick patients who attend the ED and to identify those who need to be seen and manage accordingly. Emergency severity index (ESI), a widely acceptable tool that was developed to assess illness severity, hence able to identify the sick patients that need immediate attention at triage. Objectives: Our objective is to determine the effectiveness of ESI triage acuity in early recognition of patient with sepsis and septic shock at triage in a busy ED. Methods: This was a single center, cross sectional and observational study, we include 240 cases who present to the ED of a tertiary care hospital. We follow ESI v. 4.0. All cases presenting to the ED with suspected diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock were included. Data was collected on a predesigned data sheet. Participants were followed by their electronic medical record number through patient care information software where patient’s medical diagnosis and discharge diagnosis are present. Results: Total of 240 patients in the inclusion criteria, area under curve (AUC) for the ESI score I, for septic shock was 0.943 [0.921 - 0.964] with the optimal cutoff value of 2.0, sensitivity of 88.5% and specificity 100%. Similarly, the receiver operating curve (ROC) with area under the curve of ESI Score II for sepsis is found 0.2 [0.129-0.270] with sensitivity 23% and specificity was 12.7%. Conclusion: ESI is a reliable tool which is both sensitive and specific in screening patients with septic shock in a busy emergency department.

Asian Journal of Research in Infectious DiseasesVol. 15(11)
Aga Khan University Hospital (PK)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.