Real‑world evaluation of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Therefore, eligible patients with histologically confirmed MBC, treated with ICI-based therapy, were enrolled. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety. A total of 90 patients with MBC, treated with ICI-based therapy, with different treatment lines, were included in the present study. The median age was 50 years (range, 27-76). The predominant tumor subtypes were triple negative (53.3%) and luminal (31.1%) breast cancer. The majority of patients (61.1%) were heavily pretreated (lines of treatment, ≥3). Approximately half of the patients (46.7%) had ≥3 metastatic sites. The overall ORR was 36.7% (33/90 patients), while a DCR of 78.9% (71/90 patients) was also recorded. With a median follow-up of 16.0 months, the median PFS and OS were 4.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.8-6.1] and 13.9 months (95% CI, 9.5-18.2), respectively. Patients treated with ICIs as first-line therapy exhibited notable improvement, with a median PFS of 11.0 months (95% CI, 6.0-16.0) and a median OS of 24.3 months (95% CI, 11.4-37.2). In addition, the pretreatment blood platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was an independent risk factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=2.406; 95% CI, 1.325-4.370; P=0.004] and OS (HR=2.376; 95% CI, 1.059-5.328; P=0.036). The most common adverse events were nausea (44.4%), neutropenia (42.0%) and alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase elevation (22.2%). Furthermore, three (3.3%) patients developed grade 1/2 immuno-related toxicity and recovered after supportive care. Overall, the present study suggested that the ICI-based therapy exhibited encouraging clinical outcomes with manageable toxicity in patients with MBC in real-world settings, with the most favorable efficacy in first-line treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology Letters
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14775
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real‑world evaluation of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Xiao‐Ming Xu, H Chen, Haizhu Chen, Yunxia Tao et al.
8 citations
Oncology Letters
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
2.26
article

Real‑world evaluation of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Xiao‐Ming Xu, H Chen, Haizhu Chen, Yunxia Tao, Yang Liu, Yaqin Wang, Xin Li, Xiaoyan Qian, Shuo Li, Shundong Cang
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Therefore, eligible patients with histologically confirmed MBC, treated with ICI-based therapy, were enrolled. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety. A total of 90 patients with MBC, treated with ICI-based therapy, with different treatment lines, were included in the present study. The median age was 50 years (range, 27-76). The predominant tumor subtypes were triple negative (53.3%) and luminal (31.1%) breast cancer. The majority of patients (61.1%) were heavily pretreated (lines of treatment, ≥3). Approximately half of the patients (46.7%) had ≥3 metastatic sites. The overall ORR was 36.7% (33/90 patients), while a DCR of 78.9% (71/90 patients) was also recorded. With a median follow-up of 16.0 months, the median PFS and OS were 4.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.8-6.1] and 13.9 months (95% CI, 9.5-18.2), respectively. Patients treated with ICIs as first-line therapy exhibited notable improvement, with a median PFS of 11.0 months (95% CI, 6.0-16.0) and a median OS of 24.3 months (95% CI, 11.4-37.2). In addition, the pretreatment blood platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was an independent risk factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=2.406; 95% CI, 1.325-4.370; P=0.004] and OS (HR=2.376; 95% CI, 1.059-5.328; P=0.036). The most common adverse events were nausea (44.4%), neutropenia (42.0%) and alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase elevation (22.2%). Furthermore, three (3.3%) patients developed grade 1/2 immuno-related toxicity and recovered after supportive care. Overall, the present study suggested that the ICI-based therapy exhibited encouraging clinical outcomes with manageable toxicity in patients with MBC in real-world settings, with the most favorable efficacy in first-line treatment.

Oncology LettersVol. 29(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Henan University (CN), Xuzhou Medical College (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Zhengzhou University (CN), Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (CN), Henan Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.