Quantitative Impacts of Normalizing Gluttony: Case Study of the USA

Various cultures throughout history may have established social norms around the concept of sins for pragmatic community health reasons. The concept of sin, however, has largely disappeared with the rise of modern cancel culture. Now secular society routinely normalizes all sins including the historical 'seven deadly sins', which provides a natural experiment to determine the consequences of normalizing the concept of sin. In this study, gluttony, which is defined here as the overindulgence in food, is analyzed. First, substantial evidence is provided that gluttony was first ignored and then normalized in modern U.S. society with the body positive and fat acceptance movements becoming mainstream. Then, the health and economic impacts of the expanded gluttony are quantified for the society of those practicing gluttony. The results show ignoring the concept of gluttony as a sin has correlated with a steady increase in the rate of obesity in America. Now 73.6% of the American public is overweight and obese. The U.S. now has more obese people than normal weight or overweight people. This has severe negative impacts on the health of individuals that are overweight as well as the community as a whole. Altogether the overweight and obese are expected to lose an aggregate of > 100 million life years while suffering from a wide range of concomitant diseases. In addition, the obese increase medical costs for Americans by $173 billion and the expected impacts of childhood obesity will add up to another $49 billion by midcentury. It can be safely concluded that normalizing the concept of the sin of gluttony in the U.S. has an aggregate negative impact on U.S. society.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Analysis
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53964/jia.2024011
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Impacts of Normalizing Gluttony: Case Study of the USA

Joshua M. Pearce
Journal of Information Analysis
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Quantitative Impacts of Normalizing Gluttony: Case Study of the USA

Joshua M. Pearce
article en

Abstract

Various cultures throughout history may have established social norms around the concept of sins for pragmatic community health reasons. The concept of sin, however, has largely disappeared with the rise of modern cancel culture. Now secular society routinely normalizes all sins including the historical 'seven deadly sins', which provides a natural experiment to determine the consequences of normalizing the concept of sin. In this study, gluttony, which is defined here as the overindulgence in food, is analyzed. First, substantial evidence is provided that gluttony was first ignored and then normalized in modern U.S. society with the body positive and fat acceptance movements becoming mainstream. Then, the health and economic impacts of the expanded gluttony are quantified for the society of those practicing gluttony. The results show ignoring the concept of gluttony as a sin has correlated with a steady increase in the rate of obesity in America. Now 73.6% of the American public is overweight and obese. The U.S. now has more obese people than normal weight or overweight people. This has severe negative impacts on the health of individuals that are overweight as well as the community as a whole. Altogether the overweight and obese are expected to lose an aggregate of > 100 million life years while suffering from a wide range of concomitant diseases. In addition, the obese increase medical costs for Americans by $173 billion and the expected impacts of childhood obesity will add up to another $49 billion by midcentury. It can be safely concluded that normalizing the concept of the sin of gluttony in the U.S. has an aggregate negative impact on U.S. society.

Journal of Information AnalysisVol. 2
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.