Quantifying public support for culling crown‐of‐thorns starfish ( <i>Acanthaster</i> spp.) on the <scp>Great Barrier Reef</scp>

Abstract Population surges of crown‐of‐thorns starfish (COTS) ( Acanthaster spp.) are a leading cause of coral cover loss on Australia's Great Barrier Reef (GBR). While COTS culling has been undertaken since 2012 little is known about how the public perceive COTS culling or how perceptions vary among social groups. Drawing on survey data collected in 2018 and 2022 we test the relative influence of demographic variables, social and institutional variables, and beliefs concerning the risks and benefits of culling, on public acceptance for the culling of COTS on the GBR. In contrast with previous research suggesting a polarization of views, we found limited opposition to culling (12% in 2018 and 8% in 2022). Remaining respondents, however, were almost equally divided between those who agreed or strongly agreed with culling and those who were neutral or only slightly in agreement. The strongest predictors of support, in terms of standardized mean odds ratios, were the perceived social, environmental, and ethical responsibility of culling (1.57), the manageability of culling risks (1.46), the personal importance of the GBR to the respondent (1.33), trust in science to deliver solutions (1.30), confidence in management of the GBR (1.26), and how much of a threat respondents believed COTS posed to the Reef (1.25). These findings suggest public communications about COTS culling might usefully focus on how scientific understanding, ongoing research, ecosystem monitoring, and partnerships with Reef Traditional Owners and stakeholders guide operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13252
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying public support for culling crown‐of‐thorns starfish ( Acanthaster spp.) on the Great Barrier Reef

Stewart Lockie, Gillian Paxton, Lintje Sie, Brent W. Ritchie et al.
5 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
2.29
article

Quantifying public support for culling crown‐of‐thorns starfish ( Acanthaster spp.) on the Great Barrier Reef

Stewart Lockie, Gillian Paxton, Lintje Sie, Brent W. Ritchie, Henry A. Bartelet
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Population surges of crown‐of‐thorns starfish (COTS) ( Acanthaster spp.) are a leading cause of coral cover loss on Australia's Great Barrier Reef (GBR). While COTS culling has been undertaken since 2012 little is known about how the public perceive COTS culling or how perceptions vary among social groups. Drawing on survey data collected in 2018 and 2022 we test the relative influence of demographic variables, social and institutional variables, and beliefs concerning the risks and benefits of culling, on public acceptance for the culling of COTS on the GBR. In contrast with previous research suggesting a polarization of views, we found limited opposition to culling (12% in 2018 and 8% in 2022). Remaining respondents, however, were almost equally divided between those who agreed or strongly agreed with culling and those who were neutral or only slightly in agreement. The strongest predictors of support, in terms of standardized mean odds ratios, were the perceived social, environmental, and ethical responsibility of culling (1.57), the manageability of culling risks (1.46), the personal importance of the GBR to the respondent (1.33), trust in science to deliver solutions (1.30), confidence in management of the GBR (1.26), and how much of a threat respondents believed COTS posed to the Reef (1.25). These findings suggest public communications about COTS culling might usefully focus on how scientific understanding, ongoing research, ecosystem monitoring, and partnerships with Reef Traditional Owners and stakeholders guide operations.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 6(11)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Ateneo de Manila University (PH), Cairns Hospital (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Great Barrier Reef Foundation, Australian Government, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Southern Cross University, James Cook University, Queensland University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.