Where did they come from, where did they go? Niche conservatism in woody and herbaceous plants and implications for plant‐based paleoclimatic reconstructions
Because of the inconsistent climatic niches of Zingiberaceae over geologic time, we are less confident of using them for taxonomic-based paleoclimatic reconstruction methods like nearest living relative, which assume a consistent climatic niche between extant and extinct relatives; we argue that the consistent climatic niche of Metasequoia is more appropriate for these reconstructions. Niche conservatism cannot be assumed between extant and extinct plants and should be tested further in groups used for paleoclimatic reconstructions.
Authors
- Zack J. Quirk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1759-6632)
- R. Paul Acosta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3978-1727)
- Selena Y. Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5923-0404)
- Christopher J. Poulsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5104-4271)
Institutions
- United States Department of Energy (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- University of Oregon (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Journal of Botany
- Published
- 2024-10-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.16426
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.06
Funders
- National Science Foundation