Towards defining the public interest in technology: lessons from history

Abstract The public interest suggests a singular approach to a social good, but lessons from history illustrate the nuances of sharing open space, transportation networks, and policy mandates. Serving the public exists across a spectrum of possibilities. In this essay, we consider how the emerging field of public interest technology could learn from previous assumptions about who counts as the public and how benefits or harms can be overly concentrated in certain populations. We situate public interest technology as a growing capability of government public service, an institutionalized professional practice like public interest law, as well as a site of critical inquiry. Our definition of the public interest is motivated by a theory of change that recognizes the strength of inclusion. Punctuated with historic and contemporary examples, this essay argues that by acknowledging conflicts of interest and embracing the marginal, public interest technology could build ethical infrastructures to serve all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of integrated global STEM
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jigs-2024-0008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards defining the public interest in technology: lessons from history

Anne L. Washington, Joanne Cheung
1 citations
Journal of integrated global STEM
Open Source Software Innovations
0.41
article

Towards defining the public interest in technology: lessons from history

Anne L. Washington, Joanne Cheung
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The public interest suggests a singular approach to a social good, but lessons from history illustrate the nuances of sharing open space, transportation networks, and policy mandates. Serving the public exists across a spectrum of possibilities. In this essay, we consider how the emerging field of public interest technology could learn from previous assumptions about who counts as the public and how benefits or harms can be overly concentrated in certain populations. We situate public interest technology as a growing capability of government public service, an institutionalized professional practice like public interest law, as well as a site of critical inquiry. Our definition of the public interest is motivated by a theory of change that recognizes the strength of inclusion. Punctuated with historic and contemporary examples, this essay argues that by acknowledging conflicts of interest and embracing the marginal, public interest technology could build ethical infrastructures to serve all.

Journal of integrated global STEMVol. 1(2)
New York University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Harvard University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Open Source Software Innovations
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards defining the public interest in technology: lessons from history — Anne L. Washington, Joanne Cheung · Journal of integrated global STEM (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS