A comparison of joint species distribution models for percent cover data

Abstract Joint species distribution models (JSDMs) have gained considerable traction among ecologists over the past decade, due to their capacity to answer a wide range of questions at both the species‐ and the community‐level. The family of generalised linear latent variable models in particular has proven popular for building JSDMs, being able to handle many response types including presence‐absence data, biomass, overdispersed and/or zero‐inflated counts. We extend latent variable models to handle percent cover response variables, with vegetation, sessile invertebrate and macroalgal cover data representing the prime examples of such data arising in community ecology. Sparsity is a commonly encountered challenge with percent cover data. Responses are typically recorded as percentages covered per plot, though some species may be completely absent or present, that is, have 0% or 100% cover, respectively, rendering the use of beta distribution inadequate. We propose two JSDMs suitable for percent cover data, namely a hurdle beta model and an ordered beta model. We compare the two proposed approaches to a beta distribution for shifted responses, transformed presence‐absence data and an ordinal model for percent cover classes. Results demonstrate the hurdle beta JSDM was generally the most accurate at retrieving the latent variables and predicting ecological percent cover data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14437
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of joint species distribution models for percent cover data

Francis K. C. Hui, Pekka Korhonen, Bert van der Veen, Jenni Niku et al.
5 citations
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Species Distribution and Climate Change
4.60
article

A comparison of joint species distribution models for percent cover data

Francis K. C. Hui, Pekka Korhonen, Bert van der Veen, Jenni Niku, Sara Taskinen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Joint species distribution models (JSDMs) have gained considerable traction among ecologists over the past decade, due to their capacity to answer a wide range of questions at both the species‐ and the community‐level. The family of generalised linear latent variable models in particular has proven popular for building JSDMs, being able to handle many response types including presence‐absence data, biomass, overdispersed and/or zero‐inflated counts. We extend latent variable models to handle percent cover response variables, with vegetation, sessile invertebrate and macroalgal cover data representing the prime examples of such data arising in community ecology. Sparsity is a commonly encountered challenge with percent cover data. Responses are typically recorded as percentages covered per plot, though some species may be completely absent or present, that is, have 0% or 100% cover, respectively, rendering the use of beta distribution inadequate. We propose two JSDMs suitable for percent cover data, namely a hurdle beta model and an ordered beta model. We compare the two proposed approaches to a beta distribution for shifted responses, transformed presence‐absence data and an ordinal model for percent cover classes. Results demonstrate the hurdle beta JSDM was generally the most accurate at retrieving the latent variables and predicting ecological percent cover data.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(12)
Australian National University (AU), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Academy of Finland, Koneen Säätiö, Australian Research Council, Jenny ja Antti Wihurin Rahasto
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
4.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.