Commentary: Stumbling upon Indirect Self-Enhancement in Free Will Beliefs

The paper describes a story, the pattern of which may be familiar to many scientists. A clear and well thought-out hypothesis which is grounded in the empirical literature – in this case that the better-than-average effect which has been robustly demonstrated across several domains would replicate in the domain of free will – falls at the first empirical hurdle. Rather than give up, the researchers take this unplanned anomaly in the scientific process and use it as a springboard to understand better not only the better-than-average effect but also our ways of understanding free will. The final outcome is far richer than the initial project.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Trial and Error
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36850/8c95-4881
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commentary: Stumbling upon Indirect Self-Enhancement in Free Will Beliefs

Stuart Firestein, Wendy Ross
1 citations
Journal of Trial and Error
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
0.51
article

Commentary: Stumbling upon Indirect Self-Enhancement in Free Will Beliefs

Stuart Firestein, Wendy Ross
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper describes a story, the pattern of which may be familiar to many scientists. A clear and well thought-out hypothesis which is grounded in the empirical literature – in this case that the better-than-average effect which has been robustly demonstrated across several domains would replicate in the domain of free will – falls at the first empirical hurdle. Rather than give up, the researchers take this unplanned anomaly in the scientific process and use it as a springboard to understand better not only the better-than-average effect but also our ways of understanding free will. The final outcome is far richer than the initial project.

Journal of Trial and Error
London Metropolitan University (GB), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.