Update on the treatment of <i>BRAF</i>mut metastatic melanoma and future perspectives

Abstract v‐Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B ( BRAF ) mutations were first identified in melanoma in 2002, leading to increased cell division and proliferation, and resultant tumour growth. The identification and characterisation of BRAF mutations ( BRAF mut) led to the development of several highly specific, BRAF‐, then mitogen‐activated kinase enzyme (MEK)‐targeted therapies that have enabled rapid tumour responses and improved treatment outcomes in most patients with metastatic BRAF mut melanoma. The combination of these two drug classes (BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors) has demonstrated improved response rates, progression‐free survival, and overall survival (OS), along with a more tolerable safety profile, compared with BRAF inhibition alone. In parallel, improved knowledge of the immune system has enabled the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), although immune‐related adverse events with ICIs may prove to be problematic in some patients and require careful management. While targeted therapy appears to provide rapid disease control in a relatively high proportion of patients, the development of secondary resistance may limit the overall duration of responses. Acquired resistance, along with primary resistance, has also been reported for ICIs, with a lower overall response rate to that with targeted therapy, although durable responses have been reported in some responding patients. A combination strategy of targeted therapy with ICIs has demonstrated modest increases in efficacy compared with targeted therapy combinations, although data significance varies across studies, there is increased risk of toxicity, and triple combination therapy has not yet received clinical approval in Europe. Thus, there is an ongoing need to establish optimal sequencing of these treatments in patients with advanced BRAF mut melanoma, and this has become the focus of current research. The aim of this narrative review was to provide an update on the treatment of BRAF mut metastatic melanoma, current guideline recommendations, and future clinical perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JEADV Clinical Practice
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.544
Primary Topic
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Update on the treatment of BRAFmut metastatic melanoma and future perspectives

Sylvie Pfersch, Célèste Lebbé, Inès Nakouri, Peter Mohr et al.
JEADV Clinical Practice
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
article

Update on the treatment of BRAFmut metastatic melanoma and future perspectives

Sylvie Pfersch, Célèste Lebbé, Inès Nakouri, Peter Mohr, François Denjean
article en

Abstract

Abstract v‐Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B ( BRAF ) mutations were first identified in melanoma in 2002, leading to increased cell division and proliferation, and resultant tumour growth. The identification and characterisation of BRAF mutations ( BRAF mut) led to the development of several highly specific, BRAF‐, then mitogen‐activated kinase enzyme (MEK)‐targeted therapies that have enabled rapid tumour responses and improved treatment outcomes in most patients with metastatic BRAF mut melanoma. The combination of these two drug classes (BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors) has demonstrated improved response rates, progression‐free survival, and overall survival (OS), along with a more tolerable safety profile, compared with BRAF inhibition alone. In parallel, improved knowledge of the immune system has enabled the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), although immune‐related adverse events with ICIs may prove to be problematic in some patients and require careful management. While targeted therapy appears to provide rapid disease control in a relatively high proportion of patients, the development of secondary resistance may limit the overall duration of responses. Acquired resistance, along with primary resistance, has also been reported for ICIs, with a lower overall response rate to that with targeted therapy, although durable responses have been reported in some responding patients. A combination strategy of targeted therapy with ICIs has demonstrated modest increases in efficacy compared with targeted therapy combinations, although data significance varies across studies, there is increased risk of toxicity, and triple combination therapy has not yet received clinical approval in Europe. Thus, there is an ongoing need to establish optimal sequencing of these treatments in patients with advanced BRAF mut melanoma, and this has become the focus of current research. The aim of this narrative review was to provide an update on the treatment of BRAF mut metastatic melanoma, current guideline recommendations, and future clinical perspectives.

JEADV Clinical PracticeVol. 4(1)
Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Elbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude (DE), Pierre Fabre (France) (FR), Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR)
Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi Genzyme
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.