What Deters Earnings Management? A Benford's Law Comparison Between Publicized Detection Methods and Increased Regulations

ABSTRACT This paper examines the impact of public awareness and regulatory changes on earnings management over time. Despite scrutiny from regulators, auditors, and investors, the deterrents of earnings management remain unclear. I explore whether public awareness, through the dissemination of research, can influence market behaviors and reduce earnings management activities due to increased detection and penalties. Alternatively, I investigate if stricter regulation plays a role in curbing earnings manipulation. Using Benford's Law, I apply Thomas’ (1989) approach and compare data from 1950 to 1985, 1990 to 2002, and 2003 to 2020. My findings indicate that while public awareness alone does not deter earnings management, heightened regulation, particularly post‐Sarbanes‐Oxley Act (SOX), significantly reduces such practices. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the comparative impact of public awareness and regulatory changes on earnings management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22762
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Deters Earnings Management? A Benford's Law Comparison Between Publicized Detection Methods and Increased Regulations

Arthur M. Tran
2 citations
Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance
Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
1.42
article

What Deters Earnings Management? A Benford's Law Comparison Between Publicized Detection Methods and Increased Regulations

Arthur M. Tran
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the impact of public awareness and regulatory changes on earnings management over time. Despite scrutiny from regulators, auditors, and investors, the deterrents of earnings management remain unclear. I explore whether public awareness, through the dissemination of research, can influence market behaviors and reduce earnings management activities due to increased detection and penalties. Alternatively, I investigate if stricter regulation plays a role in curbing earnings manipulation. Using Benford's Law, I apply Thomas’ (1989) approach and compare data from 1950 to 1985, 1990 to 2002, and 2003 to 2020. My findings indicate that while public awareness alone does not deter earnings management, heightened regulation, particularly post‐Sarbanes‐Oxley Act (SOX), significantly reduces such practices. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the comparative impact of public awareness and regulatory changes on earnings management.

Journal of Corporate Accounting & FinanceVol. 36(2)
Southeastern Oklahoma State University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.