Rethinking ‘protection’ in international relations: a collection of interventions

These intervention pieces seek to question protection, a concept within International Relations (IR) that is everywhere, yet rarely explicitly discussed. The field of IR is founded upon the central tenets of state, power and security. Protection is implicit within these concepts. It is both the outcome and the promise of security–it is inbetween. But what is protection? Practices of protection are not only under-theorised but also uphold unjust hierarchies by placing value only on particular kinds of life in particular kinds of ways. Protection is a fundamental part of how the world is imagined and enacted, and yet the concept of protection itself continues to evade sustained interrogation. Through this short series of reflections, we invite researchers who have grappled with the concept of protection within their work, to interrogate and problematise protection and how it is used in research and also experienced, in order to lay the foundations for a comprehensive research agenda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Studies on Security
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2024.2418707
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking ‘protection’ in international relations: a collection of interventions

Emily Clifford, Louise Ridden, Hannah K. Richards, Luise Bendfeldt
Critical Studies on Security
International Law and Human Rights
article

Rethinking ‘protection’ in international relations: a collection of interventions

Emily Clifford, Louise Ridden, Hannah K. Richards, Luise Bendfeldt
article en

Abstract

These intervention pieces seek to question protection, a concept within International Relations (IR) that is everywhere, yet rarely explicitly discussed. The field of IR is founded upon the central tenets of state, power and security. Protection is implicit within these concepts. It is both the outcome and the promise of security–it is inbetween. But what is protection? Practices of protection are not only under-theorised but also uphold unjust hierarchies by placing value only on particular kinds of life in particular kinds of ways. Protection is a fundamental part of how the world is imagined and enacted, and yet the concept of protection itself continues to evade sustained interrogation. Through this short series of reflections, we invite researchers who have grappled with the concept of protection within their work, to interrogate and problematise protection and how it is used in research and also experienced, in order to lay the foundations for a comprehensive research agenda.

Critical Studies on SecurityVol. 13(1)
Uppsala University (SE), St George's, University of London (GB), Tampere University (FI), University of Bristol (GB), City St George's, University of London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.