Supersizing the Impact of Unions in Downsizing Processes: A Configurational Approach Based on 19 Cases in France

This article explores how unions can influence employer decisions to downsize – a longstanding question that has been addressed through three waves of research. Although the literature has successively identified three types of factors that influence managerial decisions to downsize, it has not fully addressed the interactions of these factors, leading to inconsistencies. This article builds on and refines the existing work through a configurational approach which qualitatively evidences six downsizing configurations through a uniquely large number of cases ( n = 19). This research sheds new light on how factors combine to enhance union influence by theorizing four types of chemical-like factor interactions: catalysing, inhibiting, synthesizing and decomposing. By highlighting this interactive chemistry, this configurational approach revisits longstanding academic debates about the context–union strategy fit and the relative efficacy of union responses. From a practical perspective, it encourages unions to reject the idea that there is a single, optimal strategy for addressing downsizing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work Employment and Society
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170241289245
Primary Topic
Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supersizing the Impact of Unions in Downsizing Processes: A Configurational Approach Based on 19 Cases in France

Vincent Pasquier, Géraldine Schmidt, Rémi Bourguignon
Work Employment and Society
Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring
article

Supersizing the Impact of Unions in Downsizing Processes: A Configurational Approach Based on 19 Cases in France

Vincent Pasquier, Géraldine Schmidt, Rémi Bourguignon
article en

Abstract

This article explores how unions can influence employer decisions to downsize – a longstanding question that has been addressed through three waves of research. Although the literature has successively identified three types of factors that influence managerial decisions to downsize, it has not fully addressed the interactions of these factors, leading to inconsistencies. This article builds on and refines the existing work through a configurational approach which qualitatively evidences six downsizing configurations through a uniquely large number of cases ( n = 19). This research sheds new light on how factors combine to enhance union influence by theorizing four types of chemical-like factor interactions: catalysing, inhibiting, synthesizing and decomposing. By highlighting this interactive chemistry, this configurational approach revisits longstanding academic debates about the context–union strategy fit and the relative efficacy of union responses. From a practical perspective, it encourages unions to reject the idea that there is a single, optimal strategy for addressing downsizing.

Work Employment and SocietyVol. 39(3)
HEC Montréal (CA), Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.