Alien or Australian? The Involuntary Deprivation of Citizenship for Repudiation of Allegiance to Australia under Section 51(xxix) of the Constitution

The High Court handed down a trio of cases in 2022–23 regarding ministerial powers to involuntarily deprive an Australian citizen of their citizenship. In the first of these decisions, Alexander v Minister for Home Affairs, the Court considered that the aliens power in section 51(xix) of the Constitution was capable of supporting laws providing for involuntary citizenship deprivation in response to a citizen’s conduct. This article challenges that suggestion. I argue that an Australian citizen’s allegiance to Australia cannot be unintentionally repudiated by their conduct. Thus, a citizen’s conduct alone cannot render them an alien, at risk of losing their citizenship pursuant to a law supported by the aliens power. Ultimately, this view posits a more enduring concept of Australian citizenship.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of New South Wales Law Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53637/uaby1724
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alien or Australian? The Involuntary Deprivation of Citizenship for Repudiation of Allegiance to Australia under Section 51(xxix) of the Constitution

Ashwini Ravindran
University of New South Wales Law Journal
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

Alien or Australian? The Involuntary Deprivation of Citizenship for Repudiation of Allegiance to Australia under Section 51(xxix) of the Constitution

Ashwini Ravindran
article en

Abstract

The High Court handed down a trio of cases in 2022–23 regarding ministerial powers to involuntarily deprive an Australian citizen of their citizenship. In the first of these decisions, Alexander v Minister for Home Affairs, the Court considered that the aliens power in section 51(xix) of the Constitution was capable of supporting laws providing for involuntary citizenship deprivation in response to a citizen’s conduct. This article challenges that suggestion. I argue that an Australian citizen’s allegiance to Australia cannot be unintentionally repudiated by their conduct. Thus, a citizen’s conduct alone cannot render them an alien, at risk of losing their citizenship pursuant to a law supported by the aliens power. Ultimately, this view posits a more enduring concept of Australian citizenship.

University of New South Wales Law JournalVol. 47(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.