C-Shaped Canal Prevalence and Morphology in Maxillary Molar Teeth: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation

Background: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence and morphology of the C-shaped root canal(s) in maxillary molar teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Methods: In 2024, the maxillary CBCT volumes of 475 patients were evaluated for C-shaped canal morphology at 3 different axial levels of the molar roots. Classification of the C-shaped canal was done according to the root fusion type, followed by consecutive axial slices with an upper-C (UC)1 or UC2 configuration. The Z-test for proportions in independent groups was used to analyze the differences between location (left and right sides) and tooth (first or second upper molars). The chi-square test was used to compare root fusion types (P=.05). Results: C-shaped canal morphology was found in 4.89% of 797 maxillary molars. C-shaped canal was encountered in 8% of maxillary second and 2% of maxillary first molars. Six different types of UC configurations were observed, with type-A canal structure (23%) having the highest occurrence (P > .05). UC1 configuration was more common in the second molars at the middle (P=.017) and apical levels (P=.007). Conclusion: Despite the low prevalence, high complexity in morphology requires the attention of clinicians regarding C-shaped maxillary molars to avoid failures and complications. Cite this article as: Ulusoy AC, Aslan E, Baksı BG, Mert A, Şen BH. C-shaped canal prevalence and morphology in maxillary molar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Essent Dent. 2024;3(3):100-105.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Essentials of Dentistry
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5152/essentdent.2024.24009
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

C-Shaped Canal Prevalence and Morphology in Maxillary Molar Teeth: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation

Elif Aslan, Bilge Hakan Şen, A. Canberk Ulusoy, B. Güniz Baksı et al.
Essentials of Dentistry
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

C-Shaped Canal Prevalence and Morphology in Maxillary Molar Teeth: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation

Elif Aslan, Bilge Hakan Şen, A. Canberk Ulusoy, B. Güniz Baksı, Ali Mert
article en

Abstract

Background: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence and morphology of the C-shaped root canal(s) in maxillary molar teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Methods: In 2024, the maxillary CBCT volumes of 475 patients were evaluated for C-shaped canal morphology at 3 different axial levels of the molar roots. Classification of the C-shaped canal was done according to the root fusion type, followed by consecutive axial slices with an upper-C (UC)1 or UC2 configuration. The Z-test for proportions in independent groups was used to analyze the differences between location (left and right sides) and tooth (first or second upper molars). The chi-square test was used to compare root fusion types (P=.05). Results: C-shaped canal morphology was found in 4.89% of 797 maxillary molars. C-shaped canal was encountered in 8% of maxillary second and 2% of maxillary first molars. Six different types of UC configurations were observed, with type-A canal structure (23%) having the highest occurrence (P > .05). UC1 configuration was more common in the second molars at the middle (P=.017) and apical levels (P=.007). Conclusion: Despite the low prevalence, high complexity in morphology requires the attention of clinicians regarding C-shaped maxillary molars to avoid failures and complications. Cite this article as: Ulusoy AC, Aslan E, Baksı BG, Mert A, Şen BH. C-shaped canal prevalence and morphology in maxillary molar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Essent Dent. 2024;3(3):100-105.

Essentials of DentistryVol. 3(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.